Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jutta A. Mülle

dblp:m/JuttaMulle · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-5515-7756ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 8 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Services computing and microservices · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Services computing and microservices
workflow management
0.112006
Building Conference Proceedings Requires Adaptable Workflow and Content Management · VLDB 2006
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Reduction of data-value-aware process models: A relevance-based approach
Elaheh Ordoni, Jutta A. Mülle, Klemens Böhm
Inf. Syst.2
2019 A practical data-flow verification scheme for business processes
Jutta A. Mülle, Christine Schäler, Klemens Böhm
Inf. Syst.1
2016 Property specification, process verification, and reporting - A case study with vehicle-commissioning processes
Richard Mrasek, Jutta A. Mülle, Klemens Böhm, Michael Becker 0002, Christian Allmann
Inf. Syst.2
2015 Automatic Generation of Optimized Process Models from Declarative Specifications
Richard Mrasek, Jutta A. Mülle, Klemens Böhm
CAiSE2
2015 A new verification technique for large processes based on identification of relevant tasks
Richard Mrasek, Jutta A. Mülle, Klemens Böhm
Inf. Syst.2
2014 User-Friendly Property Specification and Process Verification - A Case Study with Vehicle-Commissioning Processes
Richard Mrasek, Jutta A. Mülle, Klemens Böhm, Michael Becker 0002, Christian Allmann
BPM2
2006 A Hybrid Approach for Generating Compatible WS-BPEL Partner Processes
Simon Moser, Axel Martens, Marc Häbich, Jutta A. Mülle
Business Process Management4
2006 Building Conference Proceedings Requires Adaptable Workflow and Content Management
Jutta A. Mülle, Klemens Böhm, Nicolas Roper, Tobias Sunder
VLDB1
2000 Modular Development of Multimedia Courseware
abstract
The use of multimedia in courseware and Web based learning is a current topic. This is influenced by the wide availability and the permanently improving technical possibilities. The employment of multimedia technology in education makes it possible to illustrate and to grasp complex processes and coherences. However, the development of multimedia content is still a very costly and tedious task. In order to reduce the costs and effort needed to build multimedia contents, it is desirable to organize the content in a modular way so that it can be (re)used and created cooperatively. The authors present a development process for multimedia contents that supports a modular cooperative design of multimedia courseware. They argue that applying modularity to courseware design not only reduces the costs but also allows the development of a high quality reusable and configurable courseware. Configurable courseware can be adapted to meet the needs and characteristics of different lecturers, students and contexts.
Khaldoun Ateyeh, Jutta A. Mülle, Peter C. Lockemann
WISE (2)2
1997 Collision of Constrained Work Spaces: A Unifying Concept for Design Interactions
abstract
Since participants in a design process are almost separated in time (in addition to the usual separation in space), databases are an ideal medium to support and control their interaction. The basic premise of the paper is that each design artifact can be represented as a design object which occupies a certain domain in an n-dimensional work space which includes time in order to reflect the design stage during which certain design decisions are valid. The central hypothesis of the paper is that various kinds of interaction among designers (such as detecting the effects of decisions by other designers and responding to them by, e.g., performing corrections or retracing older states in order to resume work from there, and such as detecting that their own decisions may affect either designers and reacting to them by explicit notification of changes to other individuals) can all be explained by the same concept of work space collision. Constraints associated with the work spaces can be used to arbitrate between the conflicts in the colliding work spaces. The idea is applied to a variety of interaction forms to demonstrate its validity.
Rose Sturm, Jutta A. Mülle, Peter C. Lockemann
CoopIS2
1988 Supporting Semantic Rules by a Generalized Event/Trigger Mechanism
Angelika Kotz Dittrich, Klaus R. Dittrich, Jutta A. Mülle
EDBT3