Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tom Murray 0001

dblp:m/ThomasJMurray · also Thomas J. Murray 0001 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
26ranked-venue papers
9as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-5459-018XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 22 · 8 first-author · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 21 · 8 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Learning and educational technologies · 67% Human-robot interaction · 33%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Face, body and person analysis · 94% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 6%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction
engagement prediction
0.712023
COVES: A Cognitive-Affective Deep Model that Personalizes Math Problem Difficulty in Real Time and Improves Student Engagement with an Online Tutor · ACM Multimedia 2023
Learning and educational technologies
personalized learning
0.712023
COVES: A Cognitive-Affective Deep Model that Personalizes Math Problem Difficulty in Real Time and Improves Student Engagement with an Online Tutor · ACM Multimedia 2023
Learning and educational technologies
student engagement
0.712023
COVES: A Cognitive-Affective Deep Model that Personalizes Math Problem Difficulty in Real Time and Improves Student Engagement with an Online Tutor · ACM Multimedia 2023
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
facial expression analysis
0.212023
COVES: A Cognitive-Affective Deep Model that Personalizes Math Problem Difficulty in Real Time and Improves Student Engagement with an Online Tutor · ACM Multimedia 2023
Computing education
intelligent tutoring systems
0.021992
Results of Encoding Knowledge with Tutor Construction Tools · AAAI 1992
A Framework for Representing Tutorial Discourse · IJCAI 1987
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
discourse representation
0.011987
A Framework for Representing Tutorial Discourse · IJCAI 1987

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

log data fusion · 1.3deep learning · 1.3computer vision · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Affect Behavior Prediction: Using Transformers and Timing Information to Make Early Predictions of Student Exercise Outcome
Hao Yu 0014, Danielle Allessio, William Rebelsky, Tom Murray 0001, John J. Magee, Ivon Arroyo, Beverly P. Woolf, Sarah Adel Bargal, Margrit Betke
AIED (2)4
2023 COVES: A Cognitive-Affective Deep Model that Personalizes Math Problem Difficulty in Real Time and Improves Student Engagement with an Online Tutor
abstract
A key to personalized online learning is presenting content at an appropriate difficulty level; content that is too difficult can cause frustration and content that is too easy may result in boredom. Appropriate content can improve students' engagement and learning outcome. In this research, we propose a computer vision enhanced problem selector (COVES), a deep learning model to select a personalized difficulty level for each student. A combination of visual information and traditional log data is used to predict student-problem interactions, which are then used to guide problem difficulty selection in real time. COVES was trained on a dataset of fifty-one sixth-grade students interacting with the online math tutor MathSpring. Once COVES was integrated into the tutor, its effectiveness was tested with twenty-two seventh-grade students in controlled experiments. Students who received problems at an appropriate difficulty level, based on real-time predictions of their performance, demonstrated improved engagement with the math tutor. Results indicate that COVES leads to higher mastery of math concepts, better timing, and higher scores, thus providing a positive learning experience for the participants.
Hao Yu 0014, Danielle Allessio, William Lee 0002, William Rebelsky, Frank Sylvia, Tom Murray 0001, John J. Magee, Ivon Arroyo, Beverly P. Woolf, Sarah Adel Bargal, Margrit Betke
ACM Multimedia6
2021 Affective Teacher Tools: Affective Class Report Card and Dashboard
Ankit Gupta 0016, Neeraj Menon, William Lee 0002, William Rebelsky, Danielle Allessio, Tom Murray 0001, Beverly P. Woolf, Jacob Whitehill, Ivon Arroyo
AIED (1)6
2021 Leveraging Affect Transfer Learning for Behavior Prediction in an Intelligent Tutoring System
abstract
In this work, we propose a video-based transfer learning approach for predicting problem outcomes of students working with an intelligent tutoring system (ITS). By analyzing a student's face and gestures, our method predicts the outcome of a student answering a problem in an ITS from a video feed. Our work is motivated by the reasoning that the ability to predict such outcomes enables tutoring systems to adjust interventions, such as hints and encouragement, and to ultimately yield improved student learning. We collected a large labeled dataset of student interactions with an intelligent online math tutor consisting of 68 sessions, where 54 individual students solved 2,749 problems. We will release this dataset publicly upon publication of this paper. It will be available at https://www.cs.bu.edu/faculty/betke/research/learning/. Working with this dataset, our transfer-learning challenge was to design a representation in the source domain of pictures obtained “in the wild” for the task of facial expression analysis, and transferring this learned representation to the task of human behavior prediction in the domain of webcam videos of students in a classroom environment. We developed a novel facial affect representation and a user-personalized training scheme that unlocks the potential of this representation. We designed several variants of a recurrent neural network that models the temporal structure of video sequences of students solving math problems. Our final model, named ATL-BP for Affect Transfer Learning for Behavior Prediction, achieves a relative increase in mean F -score of 50 % over the state-of-the-art method on this new dataset.
Nataniel Ruiz, Hao Yu 0014, Danielle Allessio, Mona Jalal, Ajjen Joshi, Tom Murray 0001, John J. Magee, Jacob Whitehill, Vitaly Ablavsky, Ivon Arroyo, Beverly P. Woolf, Stan Sclaroff, Margrit Betke
FG6
2014 Social Network Signatures of Effective Online Communication
Xiaoxi Xu, Tom Murray 0001, Beverly P. Woolf, David A. Smith
Intelligent Tutoring Systems2
2013 An Exploration of Text Analysis Methods to Identify Social Deliberative Skill
Tom Murray 0001, Xiaoxi Xu, Beverly P. Woolf
AIED1
2013 Mining Social Deliberation in Online Communication - If You Were Me and I Were You
Xiaoxi Xu, Tom Murray 0001, Beverly P. Woolf, David A. Smith
EDM2
2012 Computational Predictors in Online Social Deliberations
Beverly P. Woolf, Tom Murray 0001, Xiaoxi Xu, Leon J. Osterweil, Lori A. Clarke, Leah Wing, Ethan Katsh
ICWSM2
2012 Supporting Social Deliberative Skills in Online Classroom Dialogues: Preliminary Results Using Automated Text Analysis
Tom Murray 0001, Beverly P. Woolf, Xiaoxi Xu, Stefanie Shipe, Scott Howard, Leah Wing
ITS1
2010 Recognizing Dialogue Content in Student Collaborative Conversation
Toby Dragon, Mark Floryan, Beverly P. Woolf, Tom Murray 0001
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (2)4
2010 Collaboration and Content Recognition Features in an Inquiry Tutor
Mark Floryan, Toby Dragon, Beverly P. Woolf, Tom Murray 0001
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (2)4
2009 Intelligent Coaching for Collaboration in Ill-Defined Domains
abstract
This research seeks to improve learning by integrating intelligent coaching with peer-to-peer collaboration. We combine advanced technologies that support student freedom and exploration, allow for collaboration and peer tutoring, and provide task advice by modeling student work and behavior. We empirically evaluated both the effect of added collaborative features that enable peer-to-peer interaction and the potential to use this collaboration to improve the intelligent coaching features of the system. We found that collaboration enhances student work and that the coaching features provide opportunities to promote collaboration.
Toby Dragon, Beverly P. Woolf, Tom Murray 0001
AIED3
2007 Workshop on Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning in ITSs
Ido Roll, Vincent Aleven, Roger Azevedo, Ryan Baker 0001, Gautam Biswas, Cristina Conati, Amanda Carr, Rosemary Luckin, Antonija Mitrovic, Tom Murray 0001, Philip H. Winne
AIED10
2006 Coaching Within a Domain Independent Inquiry Environment
Toby Dragon, Beverly P. Woolf, Tom Murray 0001
Intelligent Tutoring Systems4
2005 Evaluating Inquiry Learning Through Recognition-Based Tasks
Tom Murray 0001, Kenneth Rath, Beverly P. Woolf, Merle Bruno, Toby Dragon, Kevin Kohler, Matthew Mattingly
AIED1
2005 Critical Thinking Environments for Science Education
Beverly P. Woolf, Tom Murray 0001, Toby Dragon, Kevin Kohler, Matthew Mattingly, Merle Bruno, Dan Murray, Jim Sammons
AIED2
2004 Web-Based Intelligent Multimedia Tutoring for High Stakes Achievement Tests
Ivon Arroyo, Carole R. Beal, Tom Murray 0001, Rena Walles, Beverly P. Woolf
Intelligent Tutoring Systems3
2004 Inferring Unobservable Learning Variables from Students' Help Seeking Behavior
Ivon Arroyo, Tom Murray 0001, Beverly P. Woolf, Carole R. Beal
Intelligent Tutoring Systems2
2004 Lessons Learned from Authoring for Inquiry Learning: A Tale of Authoring Tool Evolution
Tom Murray 0001, Beverly P. Woolf
Intelligent Tutoring Systems1
2002 Toward Measuring and Maintaining the Zone of Proximal Development in Adaptive Instructional Systems
Tom Murray 0001, Ivon Arroyo
Intelligent Tutoring Systems1
2000 Evaluating the Need for Intelligence in an Adaptive Hypermedia System
Tom Murray 0001, Janette Piemonte, Samia Khan, Tina Shen, Chris Condit
Intelligent Tutoring Systems1
1998 Semantics and Pedagogy in Authoring Educational Technology: Confronting the Mismatch Bewtween Researchers' Expectations and Users'
Benjamin Bell, Alex Kass, M. David Merrill, Tom Murray 0001, Brenda M. Wenzel
Intelligent Tutoring Systems4
1996 Having It All, Maybe: Design Tradeoffs in ITS Authoring Tools
Tom Murray 0001
Intelligent Tutoring Systems1
1992 Results of Encoding Knowledge with Tutor Construction Tools
Tom Murray 0001, Beverly P. Woolf
AAAI1
1992 Tools for Teacher Participation in ITS Design
Tom Murray 0001, Beverly P. Woolf
Intelligent Tutoring Systems1
1987 A Framework for Representing Tutorial Discourse
Beverly P. Woolf, Tom Murray 0001
IJCAI2