Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

An Thai Nguyen

dblp:n/ATNguyen · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network › data collection
data collection and aggregation
0.112006
Sweeps over wireless sensor networks · IPSN 2006
Internet of things and sensor networks
data dissemination
0.112006
Sweeps over wireless sensor networks · IPSN 2006
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network
0.112006
Sweeps over wireless sensor networks · IPSN 2006
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.012001
Disconnection Proofs for Motion Planning · ICRA 2001
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › sampling-based motion planning
probabilistic road-map planner
0.012001
Disconnection Proofs for Motion Planning · ICRA 2001
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
configuration space
0.012001
Disconnection Proofs for Motion Planning · ICRA 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sweep algorithm · 0.1potential function · 0.1diffusion process · 0.1probabilistic road-map planning · 0.0disconnection proving · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Sweeps over wireless sensor networks
abstract
We present a robust approach to data collection, aggregation, and dissemination problems in sensor networks. Our method is based on the idea of a sweep over the network: a wavefront that traverses the network, passes over each node exactly once, and performs the desired operation(s). We do not require global information about the sensor field such as node locations. Instead, in a preprocessing phase, we compute a potential function over the network whose gradients guide the sweep process. The sweep itself operates asynchronously, using only local operations to advance the wavefront. The gradient information provides a local ordering of the nodes that helps reduce the number of MAC-layer collisions as the wavefront advances, while also globally shaping the wavefront so as to conform to the sensor field layout. The approach is robust to both link volatility and node failures that may be present in real network conditions. The potential is computed by a stable diffusion process in which each node repeatedly set its potential to the average of the potentials of its neighbors. Aggregation paths are decided on-line as the sweep proceeds and no fixed tree structure is needed over the course of the computation. We present simulation results illustrating the correctness of the algorithm and comparing the performance of the sweep to aggregation trees under various network conditions.
Primoz Skraba, Qing Fang, An Thai Nguyen, Leonidas J. Guibas
IPSN3
2006 Deformable spanners and applications
Jie Gao 0001, Leonidas J. Guibas, An Thai Nguyen
Comput. Geom.3
2004 Collision detection for deforming necklaces
Pankaj K. Agarwal, Leonidas J. Guibas, An Thai Nguyen, Daniel Russel, Li Zhang 0001
Comput. Geom.3
2001 Disconnection Proofs for Motion Planning
abstract
Probabilistic road-map (PRM) planners have shown great promise in attacking previously infeasible motion planning problems with many degrees of freedom. Yet when such a planner fails to find a path, it is not clear that no path exists, or that the planner simply did not sample adequately or intelligently the free part of the configuration space. We propose to attack the motion planning problem from the other end, focusing on disconnection proofs, or proofs showing that there exists no solution to the posed motion planning problem. Just as PRM planners avoid generating a complete description of the configuration space, our disconnection provers search for certain special classes of proofs that are compact and easy to find when the motion planning problem is 'obviously impossible," avoiding complex geometric and combinatorial calculations. We demonstrate such a prover in action for a simple, yet still realistic, motion planning problem. When it fails, the prover suggests key milestones, or configurations of the robot that can then be passed on and used by a PRM planner. Thus by hitting the motion planning problem from both ends, we hope to resolve the existence of a path, except in truly delicate border-line situations.
Julien Basch, Leonidas J. Guibas, David Hsu, An Thai Nguyen
ICRA4