Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peter Norvig
dblp:n/PeterNorvig
· DBLP profile ↗
18ranked-venue papers
12as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 15 · 10 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 65% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 30% Information extraction and text analysis · 4% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Runtime systems and virtual machines · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 50% Distributed systems · 50% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 72% Machine learning and data management · 28% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › deep learning systems › deep learning framework
dynamic computation graphs |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Deep Learning with Dynamic Computation Graphs · ICLR (Poster) 2017 |
Computing education
AI education |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | A Survey of Current Practice and Teaching of AI · AAAI 2016 |
Distributed systems
fault tolerance |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Internet scale data analysis · KDD 2011 |
High-performance computing › data-intensive computing
large-scale data analytics |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Internet scale data analysis · KDD 2011 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval
email search |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Suggesting Email View Filters for Triage and Search · IJCAI 2009 |
Computing education
computing education research |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | A Survey of Current Practice and Teaching of AI · AAAI 2016 |
Machine learning and data management
scalable machine learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Internet scale data analysis · KDD 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
narrative understanding |
0.0 | 2 | 1983 | Frame Activated Inferences in a Story Understanding Program · IJCAI 1983 Six Problems for Story Understanders · AAAI 1983 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Inference in Text Understanding · AAAI 1987 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.0 | 2 | 1983 | Six Problems for Story Understanders · AAAI 1983 Frame Activated Inferences in a Story Understanding Program · IJCAI 1983 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
survey methodology · 0.2machine learning · 0.2distributed computing · 0.2text analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Deep Learning with Dynamic Computation Graphs
Moshe Looks, Marcello Herreshoff, DeLesley Hutchins, Peter Norvig |
ICLR (Poster) | 4 |
| 2016 | A Survey of Current Practice and Teaching of AIabstractThe field of AI has changed significantly in the past couple of years and will likely continue to do so. Driven by a desire to expose our students to relevant and modern materials, we conducted two surveys, one of AI instructors and one of AI practitioners. The surveys were aimed at gathering infor-mation about the current state of the art of introducing AI as well as gathering input from practitioners in the field on techniques used in practice. In this paper, we present and briefly discuss the responses to those two surveys. Michael Wollowski, Robert Selkowitz, Laura E. Brown, Ashok K. Goel 0001, George Luger, Jim Marshall, Andrew Neel, Todd W. Neller, Peter Norvig |
AAAI | 9 |
| 2016 | The Semantic Web and the Semantics of the Web: Where Does Meaning Come From?abstractWe would like to understand the meaning of content on the web. Bit where should that meaning come from? From markup language annotations created by the authors of the content? Crowdsourced from readers of the content? Automatically extracted by machine learning algorithms? This talk investigates the possibilities. Peter Norvig |
WWW | 1 |
| 2015 | Machine Learning for Learning at ScaleabstractThere is great enthusiasm for the idea that massive amounts of data from online interactions of learners with material can lead to a rapid improvement cycle, driven by analysis of the data, experimentation, and intervention to do more of what works and less of what doesn't. This talk discusses techniques for working with massive amounts of data. Peter Norvig |
L@S | 1 |
| 2014 | Panel: online learning platforms and data scienceabstractThe software platforms that mediate online learning experiences are the common ground where learning science and computer science intersect. This panel will discuss the affordances of current online learning platforms and lessons learned in using them with students. The goal of the panel is to help learning scientists and computer scientists understand each others' needs and how they might be effectively addressed in these platforms. The panelists, who have experience creating/using these platforms and interacting with learning scientists, will discuss how current platforms for learning at scale might evolve to better serve the community. Mehran Sahami, Jace Kohlmeier, Peter Norvig, Andreas Paepcke, Amin Saberi |
L@S | 3 |
| 2014 | Teaching computing with the IPython notebook (abstract only)abstractThe IPython Notebook is an interactive browser-based environment where you can combine code execution, text, mathematics, plots, and rich media into a single document. Originally designed for use as an electronic lab notebook for computational science, it is increasingly being used in teaching as well, and a rich ecosystem of open source plugins and extensions for teaching is growing around it. The first half of this hands-on workshop will introduce the Notebook and present examples of lessons and instructional materials built around it. In the second half, attendees will explore future directions for the Notebook as a teaching platform. For more information, please view our GitHub repository online at https://github.com/gvwilson/sigcse2014-ipython-workshop. Greg Wilson, Fernando Perez, Peter Norvig |
SIGCSE | 3 |
| 2011 | Internet scale data analysisabstractThis talk covers techniques for analyzing data sets with up to trillions of examples with billions of features, using thousands of computers. To operate at this scale requires an understanding of an increasing complex hardware hierarchy (e.g. cache, memory, SSD, another machine in the rack, disk, a machine in another data center, ...); a model for recovering from inevitable hardware and software failures; a machine learning model that allows for efficient computation over large, continuously updated data sets; and a way to visualize and share the results. Peter Norvig |
KDD | 1 |
| 2011 | Nils J. Nilsson, The Quest for Artificial Intelligence , Cambridge (2010)
Peter Norvig |
Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 2009 | Suggesting Email View Filters for Triage and Search
Mark Dredze, Bill N. Schilit, Peter Norvig |
IJCAI | 3 |
| 2006 | Editorial Note
Peter Norvig, Donald Perlis |
Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 2005 | Introduction to the Special Review Issue
Donald Perlis, Peter Norvig |
Artif. Intell. | 2 |
| 1994 | Text-Based Intelligent Systems
Peter Norvig, Paul S. Jacobs |
Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 1991 | Correcting a Widespread Error in Unification AlgorithmsabstractAbstract The unification of two patterns both containing variables is a ubiquitous operation in logic programming and in many artificial intelligence applications. Thus, many texts present unification algorithms. Unfortunately, at least seven of these presentations are incorrect. The common error occurs when logic variables are represented as binding lists; implementations that destructively update variable cells do not manifest the error. This note gives the examples that uncover the error and presents a correction. Peter Norvig |
Softw. Pract. Exp. | 1 |
| 1990 | A Critical Evaluation of Commensurable Abduction Models for Semantic Interpretation
Peter Norvig, Robert Wilensky |
COLING | 1 |
| 1987 | Inference in Text Understanding
Peter Norvig |
AAAI | 1 |
| 1985 | G. Lakoff, M. Johnson, Metaphors We Live By
Peter Norvig |
Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 1983 | Six Problems for Story Understanders
Peter Norvig |
AAAI | 1 |
| 1983 | Frame Activated Inferences in a Story Understanding Program
Peter Norvig |
IJCAI | 1 |