Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Raghunath Othayoth Nambiar
dblp:n/RaghuOthayothNambiar · also Raghunath Nambiar
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 12 · 5 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
6 papers |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 72% Energy-efficient computing · 28% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
6 papers |
Database system architecture and tuning · 30% Data integration and cleaning · 23% Information retrieval · 20% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.9 | 4 | 2018 | Analysis of TPCx-IoT: The First Industry Standard Benchmark for IoT Gateway Systems · ICDE 2018 Towards an Industry Standard for Benchmarking Artificial Intelligence Systems · ICDE 2018 Keeping the TPC Relevant! · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2013 |
Energy-efficient computing
energy-efficient data management |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Tuning servers, storage and database for energy efficient data warehouses · ICDE 2010 |
Energy-efficient computing
power-performance tradeoff |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Tuning servers, storage and database for energy efficient data warehouses · ICDE 2010 |
Energy-efficient computing › power modeling
power consumption modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Energy cost, the key challenge of today's data centers: a power consumption analysis of TPC-C results · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2008 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
benchmark |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Why You Should Run TPC-DS: A Workload Analysis · VLDB 2007 |
Database system architecture and tuning
workload characterization |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Why You Should Run TPC-DS: A Workload Analysis · VLDB 2007 |
Data integration and cleaning › data warehouse
data warehouse tuning |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Tuning servers, storage and database for energy efficient data warehouses · ICDE 2010 |
Transaction processing and concurrency control
transaction processing benchmarks |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Energy cost, the key challenge of today's data centers: a power consumption analysis of TPC-C results · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2008 |
Query processing and optimization › analytical query processing
decision support queries |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Why You Should Run TPC-DS: A Workload Analysis · VLDB 2007 |
Database system architecture and tuning
decision support systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | The Making of TPC-DS · VLDB 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
workload analysis · 0.7benchmarking · 0.7power modeling · 0.2performance evaluation · 0.2power consumption model · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Towards an Industry Standard for Benchmarking Artificial Intelligence SystemsabstractOver the past three decades, the Transaction Processing Performance Council (TPC) has developed many standards for performance benchmarking. These standards have been a significant driving force behind the development of faster, less expensive, and more energy efficient systems. Historically, we have seen benchmark standards for transaction processing, decision support systems and virtualization. In the recent years the TPC has developed benchmark standards for emerging areas such as big data analytics (BDA), the Internet of Things (IoT), database virtualization and Hyper-Convergence Infrastructure (HCI). This short paper discusses the TPC's plans for creating benchmark standards for Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. Raghunath Othayoth Nambiar |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2018 | Analysis of TPCx-IoT: The First Industry Standard Benchmark for IoT Gateway SystemsabstractBy 2020 it is estimated that 20 billion devices will be connected to the Internet. While the initial hype around this Internet of Things (IoT) stems from consumer use cases, the number of devices and data from enterprise use cases is significant in terms of market share. With companies being challenged to choose the right digital infrastructure from different providers, there is an pressing need to objectively measure the hardware, operating system, data storage, and data management systems that can ingest, persist, and process the massive amounts of data arriving from sensors (edge devices). The Transaction Processing Performance Council (TPC) recently released the first industry standard benchmark for measuring the performance of gateway systems, TPCx-IoT. In this paper, we provide a detailed description of TPCx-IoT, mention design decisions behind key elements of this benchmark, and experimentally analyze how TPCx-IoT measures the performance of IoT gateway systems. Meikel Pöss, Raghunath Othayoth Nambiar, Karthik Kulkarni, Chinmayi Narasimhadevara, Tilmann Rabl, Hans-Arno Jacobsen |
ICDE | 2 |
| 2014 | Big data in genomics: An overviewabstractStudies show that healthcare industry in U.S. alone could save billions of dollars by utilizing big data and analytics technologies. Big Data can improve operational efficiencies, help predict and plan responses to disease epidemics, improve the quality of monitoring of clinical trials, and optimize healthcare spending at all levels from patients to hospital systems to governments. Another key area is genomics sequencing which is expected to be the future of healthcare. In this paper the authors look at the opportunities, work in progress and challenges of genomics with emerging big data and analytics. Ruchie Bhardwaj, Adhiraaj Sethi, Raghunath Othayoth Nambiar |
IEEE BigData | 3 |
| 2014 | A standard for benchmarking big data systemsabstractBig Data technologies like Hadoop have become an important part of the enterprise IT ecosystem. TPC Express Benchmark™HS (TPCx-HS) was developed to provide an objective measure of hardware, operating system and commercial Apache Hadoop File System API compatible software distributions, and to provide the industry with verifiable performance, price-performance, and availability and energy efficiency metrics. The benchmark models a continuous system availability of 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Raghunath Othayoth Nambiar |
IEEE BigData | 1 |
| 2014 | BigOP: Generating Comprehensive Big Data Workloads as a Benchmarking Framework
Yuqing Zhu 0001, Jianfeng Zhan, Chuliang Weng, Raghunath Othayoth Nambiar, Jinchao Zhang 0001, Xingzhen Chen, Lei Wang 0004 |
DASFAA (2) | 4 |
| 2013 | A look at challenges and opportunities of Big Data analytics in healthcareabstractBig Data analytics can revolutionize the healthcare industry. It can improve operational efficiencies, help predict and plan responses to disease epidemics, improve the quality of monitoring of clinical trials, and optimize healthcare spending at all levels from patients to hospital systems to governments. This paper provides an overview of Big Data, applicability of it in healthcare, some of the work in progress and a future outlook on how Big Data analytics can improve overall quality in healthcare systems. Raghunath Othayoth Nambiar, Ruchie Bhardwaj, Adhiraaj Sethi, Rajesh Vargheese |
IEEE BigData | 1 |
| 2013 | Keeping the TPC Relevant!abstractThe Transaction Processing Performance Council (TPC) is a nonprofit organization founded in 1988 to define transaction processing and database benchmarks. Since then, the TPC has played a crucial role in providing the industry with relevant standards for total system performance, price-performance, and energy-efficiency comparisons. TPC benchmarks are widely used by database researchers and academia. Historically known for database-centric standards, the TPC has developed a benchmark for virtualization and is currently developing a multisource data integration benchmark. The technology landscape is changing at a rapid pace, challenging industry experts and researchers to develop innovative techniques for evaluating, measuring, and characterizing the performance of modern application systems. The Technology Conference series on Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking (TPCTC), introduced in 2009, and the new TPC-Express initiatives are steps taken by the TPC to be relevant in the coming years and beyond. Raghunath Othayoth Nambiar, Meikel Pöss |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |
| 2011 | Optimizing benchmark configurations for energy efficiencyabstractHistorically compute server performance has been the most important pillar in the evaluation of datacenter efficiency, which can be measured using a variety of industry standard benchmarks. With the introduction of industry standard servers, price-performance became the second pillar in the 'efficiencyequation'. Today with an increased awareness in the industry for power optimized designs and corporate initiatives to reduce carbon emissions, data center efficiency needs to incorporate yet another key element in this equation: energy efficiency. Initial models based on 'name-plate' power consumption have been used to estimate energy efficiency while recently industry standard consortia like SPEC, TPC and SPC have started amalgating new energy metrics with their traditional performance metrics. TPC-Energy, enables the measuring and reporting of energy efficiency for transaction processing systems and decision support systems. In this paper we analyze TPC C benchmark configurations that may achieve leadership results in TPC-Energy using existing, more energy efficient technologies, such as solid states drives for storage subsystems, low power processors and high density DRAM in back end server and middle tier systems. Even though the study is based on TPC-C configurations these configuration optimizations are applicable to other benchmarks and production systems alike. We envision that the energy efficiency metrics and related optimizations to claim benchmark leadership will accelerate development and qualifications of energy efficient component and solutions. Meikel Pöss, Raghunath Othayoth Nambiar, Kushagra Vaid |
ICPE | 2 |
| 2010 | Tuning servers, storage and database for energy efficient data warehousesabstractUndoubtedly, reducing power consumption is at the top of the priority list for system vendors, data center managers who are challenged by customers, analysts, and government agencies to implement green initiatives. Hardware and software vendors have developed an array of power preserving techniques. On-demand-driven clock speeds for processors, energy efficient power supplies, and operating-system-controlled dynamic power modes are just a few hardware examples. Software vendors have contributed to energy efficiency by implementing power efficient coding methods, such as advanced compression and enabling applications to take advantage of large memory caches. However, adoption of these power-preserving technologies in data centers is not straightforward, especially, for large, complex applications such as data warehouses. Data warehouse workloads typically have oscillating resource utilizations, which makes identifying the largest power consumers difficult. Most importantly, while preserving power remains a critical consideration, performance and availability goals must still be met with systems using power-preserving technologies. This paper evaluates the tradeoffs between existing power-saving techniques and their performance impact on data warehouse applications. Our analysis will guide system developers and data center managers in making informed decisions regarding adopting power-preserving techniques. Meikel Pöss, Raghunath Othayoth Nambiar |
ICDE | 2 |
| 2008 | Energy cost, the key challenge of today's data centers: a power consumption analysis of TPC-C resultsabstractHistorically, performance and price-performance of computer systems have been the key purchasing arguments for customers. With rising energy costs and increasing power use due to the ever-growing demand for computing power (servers, storage, networks), electricity bills have become a significant expense for today's data centers. In the very near future, energy efficiency is expected to be one of the key purchasing arguments. Some performance organizations, such as SPEC, have developed power benchmarks for single servers (SPECpower_ssj2008), but so far, no benchmark exists that measures the power consumption of transaction processing systems. In this paper, we develop a power consumption model based on data readily available in the TPC-C full disclosure report of published benchmarks. We verify our model with measurements taken from three fully scaled and optimized TPC-C configurations including client (middle-tier) systems, database server, and storage subsystem. By applying this model to a subset of 7 years of TPC-C results, we identify the most power-intensive components and demonstrate the existing power consumption trends over time. Assuming similar trends in the future, the hardware enhancements alone will not be able to satisfy the demand for energy efficiency. In its outlook, this paper looks at potential hardware and software enhancements to meet the energy efficiency demands of future systems. Realizing the importance of energy efficiency, the Transaction Processing Performance Council (TPC) has formed a working group to look into adding energy efficiency metrics to all its benchmarks. This paper is expected to complement this initiative. Meikel Pöss, Raghunath Othayoth Nambiar |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 2 |
| 2007 | Why You Should Run TPC-DS: A Workload Analysis
Meikel Pöss, Raghunath Othayoth Nambiar, David Walrath |
VLDB | 2 |
| 2006 | The Making of TPC-DS
Raghunath Othayoth Nambiar, Meikel Pöss |
VLDB | 1 |
| 2005 | Large Scale Data Warehouses on Grid: Oracle Database 10g and HP ProLiant Systems
Meikel Pöss, Raghunath Othayoth Nambiar |
VLDB | 2 |