Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cyril U. Orji

dblp:o/CyrilUOrji · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
0000-0003-1092-9692ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
4 papers
Storage systems · 54% Performance modeling and evaluation · 30% Memory systems · 16%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Transaction processing and concurrency control · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems
disk array
0.011993
Doubly Distorted Mirrors · SIGMOD Conference 1993
Storage systems › storage reliability
disk mirroring
0.011993
Doubly Distorted Mirrors · SIGMOD Conference 1993
Storage systems
storage reliability
0.011993
Doubly Distorted Mirrors · SIGMOD Conference 1993
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.011991
A Methodology for Benchmarking Distributed Database Management Systems · ICDE 1991
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking
database system benchmarking
0.011991
A Methodology for Benchmarking Distributed Database Management Systems · ICDE 1991
Memory systems › cache management › storage caching
disk cache
0.011990
Write-Only Disk Caches · SIGMOD Conference 1990
Transaction processing and concurrency control
concurrency control
0.011988
A Performance Analysis of an Optimistic and a Basic Timestamp-Ordering Concurrency Control Algorithm for Centralized Database Systems · ICDE 1988
Transaction processing and concurrency control › concurrency control
optimistic concurrency control
0.011988
A Performance Analysis of an Optimistic and a Basic Timestamp-Ordering Concurrency Control Algorithm for Centralized Database Systems · ICDE 1988
Transaction processing and concurrency control › concurrency control
timestamp-based concurrency control
0.011988
A Performance Analysis of an Optimistic and a Basic Timestamp-Ordering Concurrency Control Algorithm for Centralized Database Systems · ICDE 1988
Memory systems
cache design
0.011990
Write-Only Disk Caches · SIGMOD Conference 1990

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workload characterization · 0.0query type classification · 0.0simulation · 0.0performance comparison · 0.0performance analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Design and Configuration Rationales for Digital Video Storage and Delivery Systems
Cyril U. Orji, Donald A. Adjeroh, Patrick O. Bobbie, Kingsley C. Nwosu
Multim. Tools Appl.1
1997 Spatio-Temporal Effects of Multimedia Objects Storage and Delivery for Video-on-Demand Systems
Cyril U. Orji, Patrick O. Bobbie, Kingsley C. Nwosu
Multim. Syst.1
1997 Techniques for Fast Partitioning of Compressed and Uncompressed Video
Donald A. Adjeroh, Moon-Chuen Lee, Cyril U. Orji
Multim. Tools Appl.3
1996 Data Layout for Interactive Video-on-Demand Storage Systems
Cyril U. Orji, Kingsley C. Nwosu
SEKE1
1993 Doubly Distorted Mirrors
abstract
Traditional mirrored disk systems provide high reliability by multiplexing disks. Performance is improved with parallel reads and shorter read seeks. However, writes must be performed by both disks, limiting performance.
Cyril U. Orji, Jon A. Solworth
SIGMOD Conference1
1993 Distored Mapping Techniques to Achieve High Performance in Mirrored Disk Systems
Jon A. Solworth, Cyril U. Orji
Distributed Parallel Databases2
1991 A Methodology for Benchmarking Distributed Database Management Systems
abstract
A methodology for benchmarking distributed database management systems is proposed. A distributed environment is characterized in terms of the communication costs incurred in data movement between sites, the number of nodes that participate in processing a query and the data distribution scheme used in the network. These three major characteristics form a basis for eight query types that capture the query performance characteristics in the network. It is demonstrated that the performance characteristics of any distributed database management system can be captured by running queries based on these query types. Preliminary results obtained in applying the methodology in a single-user LAN environment are presented.>
Cyril U. Orji
ICDE1
1990 Write-Only Disk Caches
abstract
With recent declines in the cost of semiconductor memory and the increasing need for high performance I/O disk systems, it makes sense to consider the design of large caches. In this paper, we consider the effect of caching writes. We show that cache sizes in the range of a few percent allow writes to be performed at negligible or no cost and independently of locality considerations.
Jon A. Solworth, Cyril U. Orji
SIGMOD Conference2
1988 A Performance Analysis of an Optimistic and a Basic Timestamp-Ordering Concurrency Control Algorithm for Centralized Database Systems
abstract
A study is made of a known implementation of an optimistic concurrency-control algorithm for centralized database systems and improvements are suggested to the algorithm. The authors propose an implementation of an algorithm for the basic timestamp-ordering concurrency control in centralized database systems. The two algorithms are compared by simulation experiments. As expected, the optimistic approach is better for transaction mixes dominated by retrievals. For transaction mixes dominated by updates, the optimistic algorithm spends time performing operations that have a good chance of being voided by earlier conflicting operations. The authors expected the timestamp algorithm to be better in these circumstances but, this is not the case. They attribute this to the fact that transactions used in the experiments are short, and therefore the execution time lost due to an abort is small.>
Cyril U. Orji, Leszek Lilien, Janusz Hyziak
ICDE1