Johnson and Lindenstrauss (Contemporary Mathematics, 1984) showed that for n > m, a scaled random projection A from ℝn to ℝm is an approximate isometry on any set S of size at most exponential in m. If S is larger, however, its points can contract arbitrarily under A. In particular, the hypergrid ([−B, B] ∩ ℤ)n is expected to contain a point that is contracted by a factor of κstat = Θ(B)−1/α, where α = m/n.

Private information retrieval (PIR) allows to privately read a chosen bit from an N-bit database x with o(N) bits of communication. Lin, Mook, and Wichs (STOC 2023) showed that by preprocessing x into an encoded database x, it suffices to access only polylog(N) bits of x per query. This requires |x|≥ N· polylog(N), and even larger server circuit size.

Motivated by applications to efficient secure computation, we consider the following problem of encrypted matrix-vector product (EMVP). Let ⅇ be a finite field. In an offline phase, a client uploads an encryption of a matrix M∈ ⅇmxℓ to a server, keeping only a short secret key. The server stores the encrypted matrix M. In the online phase, the client may repeatedly send encryptions qi of query vectors qi∈ ⅇℓ, which enables the client and the server to locally compute compact shares of the matrix-vector product M qi. The server learns nothing about M or qi. The shared output can either be revealed to the client or processed by another protocol.

Tree codes (Schulman, STOC 93’, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 96’) are codes designed for interactive communication. Encoding in a tree code is done in an online manner: the i-th codeword symbol depends only on the first i message symbols. Codewords should have good tree distance meaning that for any two codewords, starting at the first point of divergence, they should have large Hamming distance.

Many classical theorems in combinatorics establish the emergence of substructures within sufficiently large collections of objects. Well-known examples are Ramsey's theorem on monochromatic subgraphs and the Erdős-Rado sunflower lemma. Implicit versions of the corresponding total search problems are known to be PWPP-hard; here "implici" means that the collection is represented by a poly-sized circuit inducing an exponentially large number of objects. We show that several other well-known theorems from extremal combinatorics - including Erdős-Ko-Rado, Sperner, and Cayley's formula - give rise to complete problems for PWPP and PPP. This is in contrast to the Ramsey and Erdős-Rado problems, for which establishing inclusion in PWPP has remained elusive. Besides significantly expanding the set of problems that are complete for PWPP and PPP, our work identifies some key properties of combinatorial proofs of existence that can give rise to completeness for these classes. Our completeness results rely on efficient encodings for which finding collisions allows extracting the desired substructure. These encodings are made possible by the tightness of the bounds for the problems at hand (tighter than what is known for Ramsey's theorem and the sunflower lemma). Previous techniques for proving bounds in TFNP invariably made use of structured algorithms. Such algorithms are not known to exist for the theorems considered in this work, as their proofs "from the book" are non-constructive.

A problem is \emph{downward self-reducible} if it can be solved efficiently given an oracle that returns solutions for strictly smaller instances. In the decisional landscape, downward self-reducibility is well studied and it is known that all downward self-reducible problems are in \textsc{PSPACE}. In this paper, we initiate the study of downward self-reducible search problems which are guaranteed to have a solution -- that is, the downward self-reducible problems in \textsc{TFNP}. We show that most natural $\PLS$-complete problems are downward self-reducible and any downward self-reducible problem in \textsc{TFNP} is contained in \textsc{PLS}. Furthermore, if the downward self-reducible problem is in \textsc{TFUP} (i.e. it has a unique solution), then it is actually contained in \textsc{UEOPL}, a subclass of \textsc{CLS}. This implies that if integer factoring is \emph{downward self-reducible} then it is in fact in \textsc{UEOPL}, suggesting that no efficient factoring algorithm exists using the factorization of smaller numbers.

Abstract. A program obfuscator takes a program and outputs a “scrambled” version of it, where the goal is that the obfuscated program will not reveal much about its structure beyond what is apparent from executing it. There are several ways of formalizing this goal. Specifically, in indistinguishability obfuscation, first defined by Barak et al. [Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO, 2001, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2139, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 1–18], the requirement is that the results of obfuscating any two functionally equivalent programs (circuits) will be computationally indistinguishable. In 2013, a fascinating candidate construction for indistinguishability obfuscation was proposed by Garg et al. [Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Computing Conference, STOC, ACM, 2013, pp. 467–476]. This has led to a flurry of discovery of intriguing constructions of primitives and protocols whose existence was not previously known (for instance, fully deniable encryption by Sahai and Waters [Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2014, STOC, pp. 475–484]). Most of them explicitly rely on additional hardness assumptions, such as one-way functions. Our goal is to get rid of this extra assumption. We cannot argue that indistinguishability obfuscation of all polynomial-time circuits implies the existence of one-way functions, since if [Formula: see text], then program obfuscation (under the indistinguishability notion) is possible. Instead, the ultimate goal is to argue that if [Formula: see text] and program obfuscation is possible, then one-way functions exist. Our main result is that if [Formula: see text] and there is an efficient (even imperfect) indistinguishability obfuscator, then there are one-way functions. In addition, we show that the existence of an indistinguishability obfuscator implies (unconditionally) the existence of SZK-arguments for [Formula: see text]. This, in turn, provides an alternative version of our main result, based on the assumption of hard-on-the-average [Formula: see text] problems. To get some of our results we need obfuscators for simple programs such as [Formula: see text] circuits.

In their seminal work on nonmalleable cryptography, Dolev, Dwork, and Naor showed how to construct a nonmalleable commitment with logarithmically-many “rounds''/``slots,” the idea being that any adversary may successfully maul in some slots but would fail in at least one. Since then new ideas have been introduced, ultimately resulting in constant-round protocols based on any one-way function. Yet, in spite of this remarkable progress, each of the known constructions of nonmalleable commitments leaves something to be desired. In this paper we propose a new technique that allows us to construct a nonmalleable protocol with only a single slot and to improve in at least one aspect over each of the previously proposed protocols. Two direct byproducts of our new ideas are a four-round nonmalleable commitment and a four-round nonmalleable zero-knowledge argument, the latter matching the round-complexity of the best known zero-knowledge argument (without the nonmalleability requirement). The protocols are based on the existence of one-way functions and admit very efficient instantiations via standard homomorphic commitments and sigma protocols. Our analysis relies on algebraic reasoning, and makes use of error correcting codes in order to ensure that committers' tags differ in many coordinates. One way of viewing our construction is as a method for combining many atomic subprotocols in a way that simultaneously amplifies soundness and nonmalleability, thus requiring much weaker guarantees to begin with, and resulting in a protocol which is much trimmer in complexity compared to the existing ones.

Reductions between problems, the mainstay of theoretical computer science, efficiently map an instance of one problem to an instance of another in such a way that solving the latter allows solving the former. The subject of this work is "lossy" reductions, where the reduction loses some information about the input instance. We show that such reductions, when they exist, have interesting and powerful consequences for lifting hardness into "useful" hardness, namely cryptography. Our first, conceptual, contribution is a definition of lossy reductions in the language of mutual information. Roughly speaking, our definition says that a reduction C is t-lossy if, for any distribution X over its inputs, the mutual information I(X;C(X)) ≤ t. Our treatment generalizes a variety of seemingly related but distinct notions such as worst-case to average-case reductions, randomized encodings (Ishai and Kushilevitz, FOCS 2000), homomorphic computations (Gentry, STOC 2009), and instance compression (Harnik and Naor, FOCS 2006). We then proceed to show several consequences of lossy reductions: 1. We say that a language L has an f-reduction to a language L' for a Boolean function f if there is a (randomized) polynomial-time algorithm C that takes an m-tuple of strings X = (x_1,…,x_m), with each x_i ∈ {0,1}^n, and outputs a string z such that with high probability, L'(z) = f(L(x_1),L(x_2),…,L(x_m)). Suppose a language L has an f-reduction C to L' that is t-lossy. Our first result is that one-way functions exist if L is worst-case hard and one of the following conditions holds: - f is the OR function, t ≤ m/100, and L' is the same as L - f is the Majority function, and t ≤ m/100 - f is the OR function, t ≤ O(m log n), and the reduction has no error This improves on the implications that follow from combining (Drucker, FOCS 2012) with (Ostrovsky and Wigderson, ISTCS 1993) that result in auxiliary-input one-way functions. 2. Our second result is about the stronger notion of t-compressing f-reductions - reductions that only output t bits. We show that if there is an average-case hard language L that has a t-compressing Majority reduction to some language for t=m/100, then there exist collision-resistant hash functions. This improves on the result of (Harnik and Naor, STOC 2006), whose starting point is a cryptographic primitive (namely, one-way functions) rather than average-case hardness, and whose assumption is a compressing OR-reduction of SAT (which is now known to be false unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses). Along the way, we define a non-standard one-sided notion of average-case hardness, which is the notion of hardness used in the second result above, that may be of independent interest.

The Fiat-Shamir heuristic transforms a public-coin interactive proof into a non-interactive argument, by replacing the verifier with a cryptographic hash function that is applied to the protocol’s transcript. Constructing hash functions for which this transformation is sound is a central and long-standing open question in cryptography.

We present functions that can be computed in some fixed polynomial time but are hard on average for any algorithm that runs in slightly smaller time, assuming widely-conjectured worst-case hardness for problems from the study of fine-grained complexity. Unconditional constructions of such functions are known from before (Goldmann et al., IPL '94), but these have been canonical functions that have not found further use, while our functions are closely related to well-studied problems and have considerable algebraic structure.

A function $f$ is extractable if it is possible to algorithmically “extract,” from any adversarial program that outputs a value $y$ in the image of $f$, a preimage of $y$. When combined with hardness properties such as one-wayness or collision-resistance, extractability has proven to be a powerful tool. However, so far, extractability has not been explicitly shown. Instead, it has only been considered as a nonstandard knowledge assumption on certain functions. We make headway in the study of the existence of extractable one-way functions (EOWFs) along two directions. On the negative side, we show that if there exist indistinguishability obfuscators for circuits, then there do not exist EOWFs where extraction works for any adversarial program with auxiliary input of unbounded polynomial length. On the positive side, for adversarial programs with bounded auxiliary input (and unbounded polynomial running time), we give the first construction of EOWFs with an explicit extraction procedure, based on relatively standard assumptions (such as subexponential hardness of learning with errors). We then use these functions to construct the first 2-message zero-knowledge arguments and 3-message zero-knowledge arguments of knowledge, against verifiers in the same class of adversarial programs, from essentially the same assumptions.

The notion of non-malleability in cryptography refers to the setting where the adversary is a man-in-the-middle (MIM) who takes part in two or more protocol executions and tries to use information obtained in one, to violate the security of another. Despite two decades of research, non-malleable commitments (NMCs) have remained too inefficient to be implemented in practice, without some sort of trusted setup. In this work, we give a fast implementation of NMC in the plain model, based on the DDH assumption being hard over elliptic curve groups. Our main theoretical result is a new NMC scheme which can be thought of as a "high dimensional" generalization of the one in the recent work of [GRRV14]. Central to our efficiency improvements is a method of constraining challenges sent by the receiver. This new approach enables us to obtain dramatically improved parameters over those suggested in [GRRV14]. In particular, our work opens the door to implementations based on Elliptic Curves.

We prove that finding a Nash equilibrium of a game is hard, assuming the existence of indistinguishability obfuscation and one-way functions with sub-exponential hardness. We do so by showing how these cryptographic primitives give rise to a hard computational problem that lies in the complexity class PPAD, for which finding Nash equilibrium is complete. Previous proposals for basing PPAD-hardness on program obfuscation considered a strong "virtual black-box" notion that is subject to severe limitations and is unlikely to be realizable for the programs in question. In contrast, for indistinguishability obfuscation no such limitations are known, and recently, several candidate constructions of indistinguishability obfuscation were suggested based on different hardness assumptions on multilinear maps. Our result provides further evidence of the intractability of finding a Nash equilibrium, one that is extrinsic to the evidence presented so far.

In their seminal work on non-malleable cryptography, Dolev, Dwork and Naor, showed how to construct a non-malleable commitment with logarithmically-many "rounds"/"slots", the idea being that any adversary may successfully maul in some slots but would fail in at least one. Since then new ideas have been introduced, ultimately resulting in constant-round protocols based on any one-way function. Yet, in spite of this remarkable progress, each of the known constructions of non-malleable commitments leaves something to be desired. In this paper we propose a new technique that allows us to construct a non-malleable protocol with only a single "slot", and to improve in at least one aspect over each of the previously proposed protocols. Two direct byproducts of our new ideas are a four round non-malleable commitment and a four round non-malleable zero-knowledge argument, the latter matching the round complexity of the best known zero-knowledge argument (without the non-malleability requirement). The protocols are based on the existence of one-way functions and admit very efficient instantiations via standard homomorphic commitments and sigma protocols. Our analysis relies on algebraic reasoning, and makes use of error correcting codes in order to ensure that committers' tags differ in many coordinates. One way of viewing our construction is as a method for combining many atomic sub-protocols in a way that simultaneously amplifies soundness and non-malleability, thus requiring much weaker guarantees to begin with, and resulting in a protocol which is much trimmer in complexity compared to the existing ones.

A program obfuscator takes a program and outputs a "scrambled" version of it, where the goal is that the obfuscated program will not reveal much about its structure beyond what is apparent from executing it. There are several ways of formalizing this goal. Specifically, in indistinguishability obfuscation, first defined by Barak et al. (CRYPTO 2001), the requirement is that the results of obfuscating any two functionally equivalent programs (circuits) will be computationally indistinguishable. Recently, a fascinating candidate construction for indistinguishability obfuscation was proposed by Garg et al. (FOCS 2013). This has led to a flurry of discovery of intriguing constructions of primitives and protocols whose existence was not previously known (for instance, fully deniable encryption by Sahai and Waters, STOC 2014). Most of them explicitly rely on additional hardness assumptions, such as one-way functions. Our goal is to get rid of this extra assumption. We cannot argue that indistinguishability obfuscation of all polynomial-time circuits implies the existence of one-way functions, since if P ≠ NP, then program obfuscation (under the indistinguishability notion) is possible. Instead, the ultimate goal is to argue that if P ≠ NP and program obfuscation is possible, then one-way functions exist. Our main result is that if NP ⊈; io-BPP and there is an efficient (even imperfect) indistinguishability obfuscator, then there are one-way functions. In addition, we show that the existence of an indistinguishability obfuscator implies (unconditionally) the existence of SZK-arguments for NP. This, in turn, provides an alternative version of our main result, based on the assumption of hard-on-the average NP problems. To get some of our results we need obfuscators for simple programs such as 3CNF formulas

Pseudorandom functions (PRFs) play a fundamental role in symmetric-key cryptography. However, they are inherently complex and cannot be implemented in the class AC0 (MOD2). Weak pseudorandom functions (weak PRFs) do not suffer from this complexity limitation, yet they suffice for many cryptographic applications.

Rational proofs, recently introduced by Azar and Micali (STOC 2012), are a variant of interactive proofs in which the prover is neither honest nor malicious, but rather rational. The advantage of rational proofs over their classical counterparts is that they allow for extremely low communication and verification time. Azar and Micali demonstrated their potential by giving a one message rational proof for #SAT, in which the verifier runs in time O(n), where $n$ denotes the instance size. In a follow-up work (EC 2013), Azar and Micali proposed "super-efficient" and interactive versions of rational proofs and argued that they capture precisely the class TC0 of constant-depth, polynomial-size circuits with threshold gates.

A function f is extractable if it is possible to algorithmically "extract," from any adversarial program that outputs a value y in the image of f; a preimage of y. When combined with hardness properties such as one-wayness or collision-resistance, extractability has proven to be a powerful tool. However, so far, extractability has not been explicitly shown. Instead, it has only been considered as a non-standard knowledge assumption on certain functions.

We revisit the question of whether cryptographic protocols can replace correlated equilibria mediators in two-player strategic games. This problem was first addressed by Dodis, Halevi and Rabin (CRYPTO 2000), who suggested replacing the mediator with a secure protocol and proved that their solution is stable in the Nash equilibrium (NE) sense, provided that the players are computationally bounded. We show that there exist two-player games for which no cryptographic protocol can implement the mediator in a sequentially rational way; that is, without introducing empty threats. This explains why all solutions so far were either sequentially unstable, or were restricted to a limited class of correlated equilibria (specifically, those that do not dominate any NE, and hence playing them does not offer a clear advantage over playing any NE). In the context of computational NE, we classify necessary and sufficient cryptographic assumptions for implementing a mediator that allows to achieve a given utility profile of a correlated equilibrium. The picture that emerges is somewhat different than the one arising in semi-honest secure two-party computation. Specifically, while in the latter case every functionality is either “complete” (i.e., implies Oblivious Transfer) or “trivial” (i.e., can be securely computed unconditionally), in the former there exist some “intermediate” utility profiles whose implementation is equivalent to the existence of one-way functions. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Much of the literature on rational cryptography focuses on analyzing the strategic properties of cryptographic protocols. However, due to the presence of computationally-bounded players and the asymptotic nature of cryptographic security, a definition of sequential rationality for this setting has thus far eluded researchers. We propose a new framework for overcoming these obstacles, and provide the first definitions of computational solution concepts that guarantee sequential rationality. We argue that natural computational variants of sub game perfection are too strong for cryptographic protocols. As an alternative, we introduce a weakening called threat-free Nash equilibrium that is more permissive but still eliminates the undesirable "empty threats'' of non-sequential solution concepts. To demonstrate the applicability of our framework, we revisit the problem of implementing a mediator for correlated equilibria (Dodis-Halevi-Rabin, Crypto'00), and propose a variant of their protocol that is sequentially rational for a non-trivial class of correlated equilibria. Our treatment provides a better understanding of the conditions under which mediators in a correlated equilibrium can be replaced by a stable protocol.

By allowing routers to randomly mix the information content in packets before forwarding them, network coding can maximize network throughput in a distributed manner with low complexity. However, such mixing also renders the transmission vulnerable to pollution attacks, where a malicious node injects corrupted packets into the information flow. In a worst case scenario, a single corrupted packet can end up corrupting all the information reaching a destination. In this paper, we propose RIPPLE, a symmetric key based in-network scheme for network coding authentication. RIPPLE allows a node to efficiently detect corrupted packets and encode only the authenticated ones. Despite using symmetric key based homomorphic Message Authentication Code (MAC) algorithms, RIPPLE achieves asymmetry by delayed disclosure of the MAC keys. Our work is the first symmetric key based solution to allow arbitrary collusion among adversaries. It is also the first to consider tag pollution attacks, where a single corrupted MAC tag can cause numerous packets to fail authentication farther down the stream, effectively emulating a successful pollution attack.

We initiate the study of one-wayness under correlated products. We are interested in identifying necessary and sufficient conditions for a function f and a distribution on inputs $(x_1,\dots,x_k)$ so that the function $(f(x_1),\dots,f(x_k))$ is one-way. The main motivation of this study is the construction of public-key encryption schemes that are secure against chosen-ciphertext attacks (CCAs). We show that any collection of injective trapdoor functions that is secure under a very natural correlated product can be used to construct a CCA-secure public-key encryption scheme. The construction is simple, black-box, and admits a direct proof of security. It can be viewed as a simplification of the seminal work of Dolev, Dwork, and Naor [SIAM J. Comput., 30 (2000), pp. 391–437], while relying on a seemingly incomparable assumption. We provide evidence that security under correlated products is achievable by demonstrating that lossy trapdoor functions [Peikert and Waters, Proceedings of the 40th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2008, pp. 187–196] yield injective trapdoor functions that are secure under the above-mentioned correlated product. Although we currently base security under correlated products on existing constructions of lossy trapdoor functions, we argue that the former notion is potentially weaker as a general assumption. Specifically, there is no fully black-box construction of lossy trapdoor functions from trapdoor functions that are secure under correlated products.

We present a nonmalleable commitment scheme that retains its security properties even when concurrently executed a polynomial number of times. That is, a man-in-the-middle adversary who is simultaneously participating in multiple concurrent commitment phases of our scheme, both as a sender and as a receiver, cannot make the values to which he commits depend on the values to which he receives commitments. Our result is achieved without assuming an a priori bound on the number of executions and without relying on any setup assumptions. Our construction relies on the existence of standard claw-free permutations and requires only a constant number of communication rounds.

We present a new constant-round protocol for nonmalleable zero-knowledge. Using this protocol as a subroutine, we obtain a new constant-round protocol for nonmalleable commitments. Our constructions rely on the existence of (standard) collision-resistant hash functions. Previous constructions either relied on the existence of trapdoor permutations and hash functions that are collision resistant against subexponential-sized circuits or required a superconstant number of rounds. Additional results are the first construction of a nonmalleable commitment scheme that is statistically hiding (with respect to opening) and the first nonmalleable commitments that satisfy a strict polynomial-time simulation requirement. Our approach differs from the approaches taken in previous works in that we view nonmalleable zero-knowledge as a building block rather than an end goal. This gives rise to a modular construction of nonmalleable commitments and results in a somewhat simpler analysis.

We exhibit an average-case problem that is as hard as finding γ(n)-approximate shortest nonzero vectors in certain n-dimensional lattices in the worst case, for γ(n) = O(√log n). The previously best known factor for any non-trivial class of lattices was γ(n) = Õ(n).

We put forward a first definition of general secure computation that, without any trusted set-up, handles an arbitrary number of concurrent executions; and is implementable based on standard complexity assumptions. In contrast to previous definitions of secure computation, ours is not simulation-based

We present a non-malleable commitment scheme that retains its security properties even when concurrently executed a polynomial number of times. That is, a man-in-the-middle adversary who is simultaneously participating in multiple concurrent commitment phases of our scheme, both as a sender and as a receiver cannot make the values he commits to depend on the values he receives commitments to. Our result is achieved without assuming an a-priori bound on the number of executions and without relying on any set-up assumptions. Our construction relies on the existence of standard collision resistant hash functions and only requires a constant number of communication rounds.

We present a new constant round protocol for non-malleable zero-knowledge. Using this protocol as a subroutine, we obtain a new constant-round protocol for non-malleable commitments. Our constructions rely on the existence of (standard) collision resistant hash functions. Previous constructions either relied on the existence of trapdoor permutations and hash functions that are collision resistant against sub-exponential sized circuits, or required a super-constant number of rounds.Additional results are the first construction of a non-malleable commitment scheme that is statistically hiding (with respect to opening), and the first non-malleable protocols that satisfy a strict polynomial-time simulation requirement. The latter are constructed by additionally assuming the existence of trapdoor permutations.Our approach differs from the approaches taken in previous works in that we view non-malleable zero-knowledge as a building-block rather than an end goal. This gives rise to a modular construction of non-malleable commitments and results in a somewhat simpler analysis.The techniques that we use to construct our zero-knowl-edge protocol are non black-box, but are different than the non black-box techniques previously used in the context of non-malleable coin-tossing.

A Secure Function Evaluation (SFE) of a two-variable function f(·,·) is a protocol that allows two parties with inputs x and y to evaluate f(x,y) in a manner where neither party learns "more than is necessary". A rich body of work deals with the study of completeness for secure two-party computation. A function f is complete for SFE if a protocol for securely evaluating f allows the secure evaluation of all (efficiently computable) functions. The questions investigated are which functions are complete for SFE, which functions have SFE protocols unconditionally and whether there are functions that are neither complete nor have efficient SFE protocols.The previous study of these questions was mainly conducted from an Information Theoretic point of view and provided strong answers in the form of combinatorial properties. However, we show that there are major differences between the information theoretic and computational settings. In particular, we show functions that are considered as having SFE unconditionally by the combinatorial criteria but are actually complete in the computational setting. We initiate the fully computational study of these fundamental questions. Somewhat surprisingly, we manage to provide an almost full characterization of the complete functions in this model as well. More precisely, we present a computational criterion (called computational row non-transitivity) for a function f to be complete for the asymmetric case. Furthermore, we show a matching criterion called computational row transitivity for f to have a simple SFE (based on no additional assumptions). This criterion is close to the negation of the computational row non-transitivity and thus we essentially characterize all "nice" functions as either complete or having SFE unconditionally.

We consider the problem of constructing a general protocol for secure two-party computation in a way that preserves security under concurrent composition. In our treatment, we focus on the case where an a-priori bound on the number of concurrent sessions is specified before the protocol is constructed. (a.k.a. bounded concurrency). We make no setup assumptions. Lindel (STOC 2003) has shown that any protocol for bounded-concurrent secure two-party computation, whose security is established via black-box simulation, must have round complexity that is strictly larger than the bound on the number of concurrent sessions. In this paper, we construct a (non black-box) protocol for realizing bounded-concurrent secure two-party computation in a constant number of rounds. Our constructions rely on the existence of enhanced trapdoor permutations, as well as on the existence of hash functions that are collision-resistant against subexponential sized circuits.

We show that every language in NP has a (black-box) concurrent zero-knowledge proof system using O/spl tilde/(log n) rounds of interaction. The number of rounds in our protocol is optimal, in the sense that any language outside BPP requires at least /spl Omega//spl tilde/(log n) rounds of interaction in order to be proved in black-box concurrent zero-knowledge. The zero-knowledge property of our main protocol is proved under the assumption that there exists a collection of claw free functions. Assuming only the existence of one-way functions, we show the existence of O/spl tilde/(log n)-round concurrent zero-knowledge arguments for all languages in NP.

We show that any concurrent zero-knowledge protocol for a nontrivial language (i.e., for a language outside ${\cal BPP}$), whose security is proven via black-box simulation, must use at least $\tilde\Omega(\log n)$ rounds of interaction. This result achieves a substantial improvement over previous lower bounds and is the first bound to rule out the possibility of constant-round concurrent zero-knowledge when proven via black-box simulation. Furthermore, the bound is polynomially related to the number of rounds in the best known concurrent zero-knowledge protocol for languages in ${\cal NP}$ (which is established via black-box simulation).

The computational hardness of factoring integers is the most established assumption on which cryptographic primitives are based. This work presents an efficient construction of pseudorandom functions whose security is based on the intractability of factoring. In particular, we are able to construct efficient length-preserving pseudorandom functions, where each evaluation requires only a (small) constant number of modular multiplications per output bit. This is substantially more efficient than any previous construction of pseudorandom functions based on factoring and matches (up to a constant factor) the efficiency of the best-known factoring-based pseudorandom bit generators.

We show that any concurrent zero-knowledge protocol for a non-trivial language (i.e., for a language outside $\BPP$), whose security is proven via black-box simulation, must use at least \tildeΩ(log n) rounds of interaction. This result substantially improves over previous lower bounds, and is the first bound to rule out the possibility of constant-round black-box concurrent zero-knowledge. Furthermore, the bound is polynomially related to the number of rounds in the best known concurrent zero-knowledge protocol for languages in ~$\NP$.

Article Pseudo-random functions and factoring (extended abstract) Share on Authors: Moni Naor Dept. of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel Dept. of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, IsraelView Profile , Omer Reingold AT&T Labs - Research, 180 Park Avenue, Bldg. 103, Florham Park, NJ AT&T Labs - Research, 180 Park Avenue, Bldg. 103, Florham Park, NJView Profile , Alon Rosen Dept. of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel Dept. of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, IsraelView Profile Authors Info & Claims STOC '00: Proceedings of the thirty-second annual ACM symposium on Theory of computingMay 2000 Pages 11–20https://doi.org/10.1145/335305.335307Online:01 May 2000Publication History 15citation492DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations15Total Downloads492Last 12 Months2Last 6 weeks0 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access