Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Binkele-Raible

dblp:r/DanielRaible · also Daniel Raible 0001 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
21ranked-venue papers
11as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 18 · 10 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 60% Algorithms and data structures · 40%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity › parameterized complexity
kernelization
0.112012
Kernel(s) for problems with no kernel: On out-trees with many leaves · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2012
Computational complexity › parameterized complexity › kernelization
kernelization lower bounds
0.112012
Kernel(s) for problems with no kernel: On out-trees with many leaves · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2012
Algorithms and data structures › combinatorial algorithms
out-branchings
0.112012
Kernel(s) for problems with no kernel: On out-trees with many leaves · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2012
Algorithms and data structures
parameterized algorithms
0.112012
Kernel(s) for problems with no kernel: On out-trees with many leaves · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2012
Computational complexity
parameterized complexity
0.112012
Kernel(s) for problems with no kernel: On out-trees with many leaves · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

kernelization · 0.1extremal combinatorics · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Exact and Parameterized Algorithms for Max Internal Spanning Tree
Daniel Binkele-Raible, Henning Fernau, Serge Gaspers, Mathieu Liedloff
Algorithmica1
2013 Packing paths: Recycling saves time
Daniel Binkele-Raible, Henning Fernau
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2012 An Exact Exponential Time Algorithm for Power Dominating Set
Daniel Binkele-Raible, Henning Fernau
Algorithmica1
2012 Parameterized Measure & Conquer for Problems with No Small Kernels
Daniel Binkele-Raible, Henning Fernau
Algorithmica1
2012 Kernel(s) for problems with no kernel: On out-trees with many leaves
abstract
The k -Leaf Out-Branching problem is to find an out-branching, that is a rooted oriented spanning tree, with at least k leaves in a given digraph. The problem has recently received much attention from the viewpoint of parameterized algorithms. Here, we take a kernelization based approach to the k -Leaf-Out-Branching problem. We give the first polynomial kernel for Rooted k -Leaf-Out-Branching, a variant of k -Leaf-Out-Branching where the root of the tree searched for is also a part of the input. Our kernel with O ( k 3 ) vertices is obtained using extremal combinatorics. For the k -Leaf-Out-Branching problem, we show that no polynomial-sized kernel is possible unless coNP is in NP/poly . However, our positive results for Rooted k -Leaf-Out-Branching immediately imply that the seemingly intractable k -Leaf-Out-Branching problem admits a data reduction to n independent polynomial-sized kernels. These two results, tractability and intractability side by side, are the first ones separating Karp kernelization from Turing kernelization . This answers affirmatively an open problem regarding “cheat kernelization” raised by Mike Fellows and Jiong Guo independently.
Daniel Binkele-Raible, Henning Fernau, Fedor V. Fomin, Daniel Lokshtanov, Saket Saurabh 0001, Yngve Villanger
ACM Trans. Algorithms1
2011 An exact algorithm for the Maximum Leaf Spanning Tree problem
Henning Fernau, Joachim Kneis, Dieter Kratsch, Alexander Langer, Mathieu Liedloff, Daniel Binkele-Raible, Peter Rossmanith
Theor. Comput. Sci.6
2010 A Parameterized Route to Exact Puzzles: Breaking the 2n-Barrier for Irredundance
Daniel Binkele-Raible, Ljiljana Brankovic, Henning Fernau, Joachim Kneis, Dieter Kratsch, Alexander Langer, Mathieu Liedloff, Peter Rossmanith
CIAC1
2010 Enumerate and Measure: Improving Parameter Budget Management
Daniel Binkele-Raible, Henning Fernau
IPEC1
2010 An Amortized Search Tree Analysis for k-Leaf Spanning Tree
Daniel Binkele-Raible, Henning Fernau
SOFSEM1
2010 Exact exponential-time algorithms for finding bicliques
Daniel Binkele-Raible, Henning Fernau, Serge Gaspers, Mathieu Liedloff
Inf. Process. Lett.1
2009 Exact Exponential-Time Algorithms for Finding Bicliques in a Graph
Henning Fernau, Serge Gaspers, Dieter Kratsch, Mathieu Liedloff, Daniel Binkele-Raible
CTW5
2009 Packing Paths: Recycling Saves Time
Henning Fernau, Daniel Binkele-Raible
CTW2
2009 Kernel(s) for Problems with No Kernel: On Out-Trees with Many Leaves
abstract
The {\sc $k$-Leaf Out-Branching} problem is to find an out-branching, that is a rooted oriented spanning tree, with at least $k$ leaves in a given digraph. The problem has recently received much attention from the viewpoint of parameterized algorithms. Here, we take a kernelization based approach to the {\sc $k$-Leaf-Out-Branching} problem. We give the first polynomial kernel for {\sc Rooted $k$-Leaf-Out-Branching}, a variant of {\sc $k$-Leaf-Out-Branching} where the root of the tree searched for is also a part of the input. Our kernel has cubic size and is obtained using extremal combinatorics. For the {\sc $k$-Leaf-Out-Branching} problem, we show that no polynomial kernel is possible unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to third level by applying a recent breakthrough result by Bodlaender et al. (ICALP 2008) in a non-trivial fashion. However, our positive results for {\sc Rooted $k$-Leaf-Out-Branching} immediately imply that the seemingly intractable {\sc $k$-Leaf-Out-Branching} problem admits a data reduction to $n$ independent $O(k^3)$ kernels. These two results, tractability and intractability side by side, are the first ones separating {\it many-to-one kernelization} from {\it Turing kernelization}. This answers affirmatively an open problem regarding ``cheat kernelization'' raised by Mike Fellows and Jiong Guo independently.
Henning Fernau, Fedor V. Fomin, Daniel Lokshtanov, Daniel Binkele-Raible, Saket Saurabh 0001, Yngve Villanger
STACS4
2009 Searching Trees: An Essay
Henning Fernau, Daniel Binkele-Raible
TAMC2
2009 Exact and Parameterized Algorithms for Max Internal Spanning Tree
Henning Fernau, Serge Gaspers, Daniel Binkele-Raible
WG3
2008 A Parameterized Perspective on Packing Paths of Length Two
Henning Fernau, Daniel Binkele-Raible
COCOA2
2008 Power Domination in O*(1.7548n) Using Reference Search Trees
Daniel Binkele-Raible, Henning Fernau
ISAAC1
2008 A New Upper Bound for Max-2-SAT: A Graph-Theoretic Approach
Daniel Binkele-Raible, Henning Fernau
MFCS1
2008 Improved Algorithms and Complexity Results for Power Domination in Graphs
Jiong Guo, Rolf Niedermeier, Daniel Binkele-Raible
Algorithmica3
2007 Alliances in Graphs: a Complexity-Theoretic Study
Henning Fernau, Daniel Binkele-Raible
SOFSEM (2)2
2005 Improved Algorithms and Complexity Results for Power Domination in Graphs
Jiong Guo, Rolf Niedermeier, Daniel Binkele-Raible
FCT3