Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Udi Rotics
dblp:r/UdiRotics
· DBLP profile ↗
25ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 24Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 65% Computational complexity · 26% Mathematical optimization · 6% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory › graph parameters › graph width parameters
clique-width |
0.1 | 3 | 2006 | Clique-width minimization is NP-hard · STOC 2006 On the Relationship Between Clique-Width and Treewidth · SIAM J. Comput. 2005 Polynomial algorithms for partitioning problems on graphs with fixed clique-width (extended abstract) · SODA 2001 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory
graph parameters |
0.1 | 2 | 2006 | Clique-width minimization is NP-hard · STOC 2006 On the Relationship Between Clique-Width and Treewidth · SIAM J. Comput. 2005 |
Computational complexity
hardness of approximation |
0.1 | 2 | 2006 | Clique-width minimization is NP-hard · STOC 2006 Restrictions of Minimum Spanner Problems · Inf. Comput. 1997 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory › graph parameters › graph width parameters
treewidth |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | On the Relationship Between Clique-Width and Treewidth · SIAM J. Comput. 2005 |
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Factoring and Recognition of Read-Once Functions using Cographs and Normality · DAC 2001 |
Computational complexity › parameterized complexity
fixed-parameter tractability |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Polynomial algorithms for partitioning problems on graphs with fixed clique-width (extended abstract) · SODA 2001 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph classes |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Polynomial algorithms for partitioning problems on graphs with fixed clique-width (extended abstract) · SODA 2001 |
Computational complexity
parameterized complexity |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Polynomial algorithms for partitioning problems on graphs with fixed clique-width (extended abstract) · SODA 2001 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
partitioning problems |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Polynomial algorithms for partitioning problems on graphs with fixed clique-width (extended abstract) · SODA 2001 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms › network design
spanner problems |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Restrictions of Minimum Spanner Problems · Inf. Comput. 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hardness reduction · 0.1lower bound · 0.1exponential bounds · 0.1normality checking · 0.0graph partitioning · 0.0dynamic programming on clique-width · 0.0cograph recognition · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Clique-width of path powers
Pinar Heggernes, Daniel Meister 0001, Charis Papadopoulos, Udi Rotics |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 4 |
| 2015 | A characterisation of clique-width through nested partitions
Bruno Courcelle, Pinar Heggernes, Daniel Meister 0001, Charis Papadopoulos, Udi Rotics |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 5 |
| 2015 | Clique-width of full bubble model graphs
Daniel Meister 0001, Udi Rotics |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 2 |
| 2012 | Polynomial-time recognition of clique-width ≤3 graphs
Derek G. Corneil, Michel Habib, Jean-Marc Lanlignel, Bruce A. Reed, Udi Rotics |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 5 |
| 2010 | Exploiting Restricted Linear Structure to Cope with the Hardness of Clique-Width
Pinar Heggernes, Daniel Meister 0001, Udi Rotics |
TAMC | 3 |
| 2009 | Clique-Width is NP-CompleteabstractClique-width is a graph parameter that measures in a certain sense the complexity of a graph. Hard graph problems (e.g., problems expressible in monadic second-order logic with second-order quantification on vertex sets, which includes NP-hard problems such as 3-colorability) can be solved in polynomial time for graphs of bounded clique-width. We show that the clique-width of a given graph cannot be absolutely approximated in polynomial time unless $P = NP$. We also show that, given a graph G and an integer k, deciding whether the clique-width of G is at most k is NP-complete. This solves a problem that has been open since the introduction of clique-width in the early 1990s. Michael R. Fellows, Frances A. Rosamond, Udi Rotics, Stefan Szeider |
SIAM J. Discret. Math. | 3 |
| 2008 | An improvement on the complexity of factoring read-once Boolean functions
Martin Charles Golumbic, Aviad Mintz, Udi Rotics |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 3 |
| 2008 | Equistable distance-hereditary graphs
Ephraim Korach, Uri N. Peled, Udi Rotics |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 3 |
| 2006 | Clique-width minimization is NP-hardabstractClique-width is a graph parameter that measures in a certain sense the complexity of a graph. Hard graph problems (e.g., problems expressible in Monadic Second Order Logic with second-order quantification on vertex sets, that includes NP-hard problems) can be solved efficiently for graphs of small clique-width. It is widely believed that determining the clique-width of a graph is NP-hard; in spite of considerable efforts, no NP-hardness proof has been found so far. We give the first hardness proof. We show that the clique-width of a given graph cannot be absolutely approximated in polynomial time unless P=NP. We also show that, given a graph G and an integer k, deciding whether the clique-width of G is at most k is NPhy complete. This solves a problem that has been open since the introduction of clique-width in the early 1990s. Michael R. Fellows, Frances A. Rosamond, Udi Rotics, Stefan Szeider |
STOC | 3 |
| 2006 | Computing Graph Polynomials on Graphs of Bounded Clique-Width
Johann A. Makowsky, Udi Rotics, Ilya Averbouch, Benny Godlin |
WG | 2 |
| 2006 | Factoring and recognition of read-once functions using cographs and normality and the readability of functions associated with partial k-trees
Martin Charles Golumbic, Aviad Mintz, Udi Rotics |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 3 |
| 2005 | On the Relationship Between Clique-Width and TreewidthabstractTreewidth is generally regarded as one of the most useful parameterizations of a graph's construction. Clique-width is a similar parameterization that shares one of the powerful properties of treewidth, namely: if a graph is of bounded treewidth (or clique-width), then there is a polynomial time algorithm for any graph problem expressible in monadic second order logic, using quantifiers on vertices (in the case of clique-width you must assume a clique-width parse expression is given). In studying the relationship between treewidth and clique-width, Courcelle and Olariu [Discrete Appl. Math., 101 (2000), pp. 77--114] showed that any graph of bounded treewidth is also of bounded clique-width; in particular, for any graph G with treewidth k, the clique-width of G is at most 4 * 2 k - 1 + 1. In this paper, we improve this result by showing that the clique-width of G is at most 3 * 2 k - 1 and, more importantly, that there is an exponential lower bound on this relationship. In particular, for any k, there is a graph G with treewidth equal to k, where the clique-width of G is at least $2^{\lfloor k/2\rfloor - 1}$. Derek G. Corneil, Udi Rotics |
SIAM J. Comput. | 2 |
| 2003 | Computing the Treewidth and the Minimum Fill-In with the Modular Decomposition
Hans L. Bodlaender, Udi Rotics |
Algorithmica | 2 |
| 2003 | Finding Maximum Induced Matchings in Subclasses of Claw-Free and P 5-Free Graphs, and in Graphs with Matching and Induced Matching of Equal Maximum Size
Daniel Kobler, Udi Rotics |
Algorithmica | 2 |
| 2003 | Edge dominating set and colorings on graphs with fixed clique-width
Daniel Kobler, Udi Rotics |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 2 |
| 2003 | Equistable chordal graphs
Uri N. Peled, Udi Rotics |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 2 |
| 2001 | Factoring and Recognition of Read-Once Functions using Cographs and NormalityabstractAn approach for factoring general boolean functions was described in GM:99 which is based on graph partitioning algorithms. In this paper, we present a very fast algorithm for recognizing and factoring read-once functions which is needed as a dedicated factoring subroutine to handle the lower levels of that factoring process. The algorithm is based on algorithms for cograph recognition and on checking normality. Our method has been implemented in the SIS environment, and an empirical evaluation is given. Martin Charles Golumbic, Aviad Mintz, Udi Rotics |
DAC | 3 |
| 2001 | Polynomial algorithms for partitioning problems on graphs with fixed clique-width (extended abstract)
Daniel Kobler, Udi Rotics |
SODA | 2 |
| 2001 | On the Relationship between Clique-Width and Treewidth
Derek G. Corneil, Udi Rotics |
WG | 2 |
| 2001 | On the fixed parameter complexity of graph enumeration problems definable in monadic second-order logic
Bruno Courcelle, Johann A. Makowsky, Udi Rotics |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 3 |
| 2000 | Polynomial Time Recognition of Clique-Width \le \leq 3 Graphs (Extended Abstract)
Derek G. Corneil, Michel Habib, Jean-Marc Lanlignel, Bruce A. Reed, Udi Rotics |
LATIN | 5 |
| 2000 | Linear Time Solvable Optimization Problems on Graphs of Bounded Clique-Width
Bruno Courcelle, Johann A. Makowsky, Udi Rotics |
Theory Comput. Syst. | 3 |
| 1999 | On the Clique-Width of Perfect Graph Classes
Martin Charles Golumbic, Udi Rotics |
WG | 2 |
| 1998 | Linear Time Solvable Optimization Problems on Graphs of Bounded Clique Width
Bruno Courcelle, Johann A. Makowsky, Udi Rotics |
WG | 3 |
| 1997 | Restrictions of Minimum Spanner Problems
G. Venkatesan, Udi Rotics, M. S. Madanlal, Johann A. Makowsky, C. Pandu Rangan |
Inf. Comput. | 2 |