Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Leonard J. Seligman
dblp:s/LeonardJSeligman · also Len Seligman
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 12 · 5 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
6 papers |
Data integration and cleaning · 60% Graph data management · 22% Data models and query languages · 17% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Graph data management
path query |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Surrogate Parenthood: Protected and Informative Graphs · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2011 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving data processing
graph data privacy |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Surrogate Parenthood: Protected and Informative Graphs · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2011 |
Data integration and cleaning › data integration system
multidatabase query |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Galaxy: Encouraging Data Sharing among Sources with Schema Variants · ICDE 2009 |
Data models and query languages
schema management |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Galaxy: Encouraging Data Sharing among Sources with Schema Variants · ICDE 2009 |
Data integration and cleaning
schema matching |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Analyzing and revising data integration schemas to improve their matchability · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2008 |
Data integration and cleaning › mediator systems
mediated schema |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Analyzing and revising data integration schemas to improve their matchability · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2008 |
Data integration and cleaning › interoperability
heterogeneous data access |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Metrics for Accessing Heterogeneous Data: Is There Any Hope? (Panel) · VLDB 1995 |
Data integration and cleaning
large-scale data integration |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Data Integration in the Large: The Challenge of Reuse · VLDB 1994 |
Software maintenance and evolution
software reuse |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Data Integration in the Large: The Challenge of Reuse · VLDB 1994 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
surrogate nodes and edges · 0.2opacity measure · 0.2schema versioning · 0.1matchability scoring · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Provenance for collaboration: Detecting suspicious behaviors and assessing trust in informationabstractData collaborations allow users to draw upon diverse resources to solve complex problems. While collaborations enable a greater ability to manipulate data and services, they also create new security vulnerabilities. Collaboration participants need methods to detect suspicious behaviors (potentially M. David Allen, Adriane Chapman, Leonard J. Seligman, Barbara T. Blaustein |
CollaborateCom | 3 |
| 2011 | Surrogate Parenthood: Protected and Informative GraphsabstractMany applications, including provenance and some analyses of social networks, require path-based queries over graphstructured data. When these graphs contain sensitive information, paths may be broken, resulting in uninformative query results. This paper presents innovative techniques that give users more informative graph query results; the techniques leverage a common industry practice of providing what we call surrogates: alternate, less sensitive versions of nodes and edges releasable to a broader community. We describe techniques for interposing surrogate nodes and edges to protect sensitive graph components, while maximizing graph connectivity and giving users as much information as possible. In this work, we formalize the problem of creating a protected account G' of a graph G. We provide a utility measure to compare the informativeness of alternate protected accounts and an opacity measure for protected accounts, which indicates the likelihood that an attacker can recreate the topology of the original graph from the protected account. We provide an algorithm to create a maximally useful protected account of a sensitive graph, and show through evaluation with the PLUS prototype that using surrogates and protected accounts adds value for the user, with no significant impact on the time required to generate results for graph queries. Barbara T. Blaustein, Adriane Chapman, Leonard J. Seligman, M. David Allen, Arnon Rosenthal |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 3 |
| 2010 | OpenII: an open source information integration toolkitabstractOpenII (openintegration.org) is a collaborative effort to create a suite of open-source tools for information integration (II). The project is leveraging the latest developments in II research to create a platform on which integration tools can be built and further research conducted. In addition to a scalable, extensible platform, OpenII includes industrial-strength components developed by MITRE, Google, UC-Irvine, and UC-Berkeley that interoperate through a common repository in order to solve II problems. Components of the toolkit have been successfully applied to several large-scale US government II challenges. Leonard J. Seligman, Kris Mork, Alon Y. Halevy, Kenneth P. Smith, Michael J. Carey 0001, Kuang Chen, Chris Wolf, Jayant Madhavan, Akshay Kannan, Douglas Burdick |
SIGMOD Conference | 1 |
| 2009 | The Role of Schema Matching in Large Enterprises
Kenneth P. Smith, Michael Morse, Kris Mork, Maya Hao Li, Arnon Rosenthal, M. David Allen, Leonard J. Seligman |
CIDR | 7 |
| 2009 | Galaxy: Encouraging Data Sharing among Sources with Schema VariantsabstractThis demonstration presents Galaxy, a schema manager that facilitates easy and correct data sharing among autonomous but related, evolving data sources. Galaxy reduces heterogeneity by helping database developers identify, reuse, customize, and advertise related schema components. The central idea is that as schemata are customized, Galaxy maintains a derivation graph, and exploits it for data exchange, discovery, and multi-database query over the "galaxy" of related data sources. Using a set of schemata from the biomedical domain, we demonstrate how Galaxy facilitates schema and data sharing. Kris Mork, Leonard J. Seligman, Arnon Rosenthal, Michael Morse, Chris Wolf, Jeffrey Hoyt, Kenneth P. Smith |
ICDE | 2 |
| 2008 | Analyzing and revising data integration schemas to improve their matchabilityabstractData integration systems often provide a uniform query interface, called amediated schema, to a multitude of data sources. To answer user queries, such systems employ a set ofsemantic matchesbetween the mediated schema and the data-source schemas. Finding such matches is well known to be difficult. Hence much work has focused on developing semi-automatic techniques to efficiently find the matches. In this paper we consider the complementary problem ofimproving the mediated schema, to make finding such matches easier. Specifically, a mediated schemaSwill typically be matched with many source schemas. Thus,can the developer of S analyze and revise S in a way that preserves S's semantics, and yet makes it easier to match with in the future? In this paper we provide an affirmative answer to the above question, and outline a promising solution direction, calledmSeer. Given a mediated schemaSand a matching toolM,mSeerfirst computes a matchability score that quantifies how wellScan be matched against usingM. Next,mSeeruses this score to generate a matchability report that identifies the problems in matchingS.Finally,mSeeraddresses these problems by automatically suggesting changes toS(e.g., renaming an attribute, reformatting data values, etc.) that it believes will preserve the semantics ofSand yet make it more amenable to matching. We present extensive experiments over several real-world domains that demonstrate the promise of the proposed approach. Xiaoyong Chai, Mayssam Sayyadian, AnHai Doan, Arnon Rosenthal, Leonard J. Seligman |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 5 |
| 2005 | The Geek-Tones: An Experiment in Distributed, Real-time Musical Integration
Michael J. Carey 0001, Dean Jacobs, Leonard J. Seligman |
CIDR | 3 |
| 2000 | Decision-Centric Information Monitoring
Leonard J. Seligman, Paul E. Lehner, Kenneth P. Smith, Chris Elsaesser, David Mattox |
J. Intell. Inf. Syst. | 1 |
| 1997 | Trends and Scale-Up for Data Administration
Arnon Rosenthal, Leonard J. Seligman |
Conceptual Modeling | 2 |
| 1997 | A Mediator for Approximate Consistency: Supporting "Good Enough" Materialized Views
Leonard J. Seligman, Larry Kerschberg |
J. Intell. Inf. Syst. | 1 |
| 1995 | Metrics for Accessing Heterogeneous Data: Is There Any Hope? (Panel)
Leonard J. Seligman, Nicholas J. Belkin, Erich J. Neuhold, Michael Stonebraker, Gio Wiederhold |
VLDB | 1 |
| 1994 | Data Integration in the Large: The Challenge of Reuse
Arnon Rosenthal, Leonard J. Seligman |
VLDB | 2 |
| 1993 | An Active Database Approach to Consistency Management in Data- and Knowledge-Based SystemsabstractMany AI and other applications populate their knowledge-bases with information retrieved from large, shared databases. This paper describes a new approach to maintaining consistency between objects in dynamic, shared databases and copies of those objects which are cached in an application knowledge-base. The approach relies on an intelligent interface to active databases that we call a Mediator for Approximate Consistency (MAC). The MAC has several unique features: (1) it permits applications to specify their consistency requirements declaratively, using a simple extension of a frame-based representation language, (2) it automatically generates the interfaces and database objects necessary to enforce those consistency requirements, shielding the knowledge-base developer from the implementation details of consistency maintenance, and (3) it provides an explicit representation of consistency constraints in the database, which allows them to be queried and reasoned about. The paper describes the knowledge-base/database consistency problem and previous approaches to dealing with it. It then describes our architecture for maintaining approximate knowledge-base/database consistency, including techniques for specifying, representing, and enforcing consistency constraints. Leonard J. Seligman, Larry Kerschberg |
Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst. | 1 |