Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marko Salmenkivi
dblp:s/MarkoSalmenkivi
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 7 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › pattern mining › interesting pattern mining
interestingness of patterns |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Evaluating Attraction in Spatial Point Patterns with an Application in the Field of Cultural History · ICDM 2004 |
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Evaluating Attraction in Spatial Point Patterns with an Application in the Field of Cultural History · ICDM 2004 |
Data mining › structured data mining
spatial data mining |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Evaluating Attraction in Spatial Point Patterns with an Application in the Field of Cultural History · ICDM 2004 |
Data mining › time series analysis
change point detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Finding simple intensity descriptions from event sequence data · KDD 2001 |
Data mining › sequence analysis
event sequence modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Finding simple intensity descriptions from event sequence data · KDD 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
density estimation · 0.0markov chain monte carlo · 0.0dynamic programming · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Pre-processing Large Spatial Data Sets with Bayesian Methods
Saara Hyvönen, Esa Junttila, Marko Salmenkivi |
PKDD | 3 |
| 2006 | Finding representative sets of dialect words for geographical regions
Marko Salmenkivi |
LREC | 1 |
| 2006 | Efficient Mining of Correlation Patterns in Spatial Point Data
Marko Salmenkivi |
PKDD | 1 |
| 2005 | Using Markov chain Monte Carlo and dynamic programming for event sequence data
Marko Salmenkivi, Heikki Mannila |
Knowl. Inf. Syst. | 1 |
| 2004 | Evaluating Attraction in Spatial Point Patterns with an Application in the Field of Cultural HistoryabstractSpatial collocation rules are often useful for describing dependencies between spatial features. Still, the commonly used criteria for the interestingness of the rules and the selected neighbourhood constraints for spatial objects may be too rough for capturing the essentials of such dependencies. We demonstrate the difficulties with concrete examples on a large place-name data set. We propose a technique based on simple density estimation for assessing the interesting-ness with different neighbouring constraints. Marko Salmenkivi |
ICDM | 1 |
| 2004 | Simple Semantics in Topic Detection and Tracking
Juha Makkonen, Helena Ahonen-Myka, Marko Salmenkivi |
Inf. Retr. | 3 |
| 2003 | Topic Detection and Tracking with Spatio-Temporal Evidence
Juha Makkonen, Helena Ahonen-Myka, Marko Salmenkivi |
ECIR | 3 |
| 2001 | Finding simple intensity descriptions from event sequence dataabstractSequences of events are an important type of data arising in various applications, including telecommunications, bio-statistics, web access analysis, etc. A basic approach to modeling such sequences is to find the underlying intensity functions describing the expected number of events per time unit. Typically, the intensity functions are assumed to be piecewise constant. We therefore consider different ways of fitting intensity models to event sequence data. We start by considering a Bayesian approach using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods with varying number of pieces. These methods can be used to produce posterior distributions on the intensity functions and they can also accomodate covariates. The drawback is that they are computationally intensive and thus are not very suitable for data mining applications in which large numbers of intensity functions have to be estimated. We consider dynamic programming approaches to finding the change points in the intensity functions. These methods can find the maximum likelihood intensity function in O(n2k) time for a sequence of n events and k different pieces of intensity. We show that simple heuristics can be used to prune the number of potential change points, yielding speedups of several orders of magnitude. The results of the improved dynamic programming method correspond very closely with the posterior averages produced by the MCMC methods. Heikki Mannila, Marko Salmenkivi |
KDD | 2 |