Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marko Salmenkivi

dblp:s/MarkoSalmenkivi · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 7 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › pattern mining › interesting pattern mining
interestingness of patterns
0.012004
Evaluating Attraction in Spatial Point Patterns with an Application in the Field of Cultural History · ICDM 2004
Data mining
pattern mining
0.012004
Evaluating Attraction in Spatial Point Patterns with an Application in the Field of Cultural History · ICDM 2004
Data mining › structured data mining
spatial data mining
0.012004
Evaluating Attraction in Spatial Point Patterns with an Application in the Field of Cultural History · ICDM 2004
Data mining › time series analysis
change point detection
0.012001
Finding simple intensity descriptions from event sequence data · KDD 2001
Data mining › sequence analysis
event sequence modeling
0.012001
Finding simple intensity descriptions from event sequence data · KDD 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

density estimation · 0.0markov chain monte carlo · 0.0dynamic programming · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Pre-processing Large Spatial Data Sets with Bayesian Methods
Saara Hyvönen, Esa Junttila, Marko Salmenkivi
PKDD3
2006 Finding representative sets of dialect words for geographical regions
Marko Salmenkivi
LREC1
2006 Efficient Mining of Correlation Patterns in Spatial Point Data
Marko Salmenkivi
PKDD1
2005 Using Markov chain Monte Carlo and dynamic programming for event sequence data
Marko Salmenkivi, Heikki Mannila
Knowl. Inf. Syst.1
2004 Evaluating Attraction in Spatial Point Patterns with an Application in the Field of Cultural History
abstract
Spatial collocation rules are often useful for describing dependencies between spatial features. Still, the commonly used criteria for the interestingness of the rules and the selected neighbourhood constraints for spatial objects may be too rough for capturing the essentials of such dependencies. We demonstrate the difficulties with concrete examples on a large place-name data set. We propose a technique based on simple density estimation for assessing the interesting-ness with different neighbouring constraints.
Marko Salmenkivi
ICDM1
2004 Simple Semantics in Topic Detection and Tracking
Juha Makkonen, Helena Ahonen-Myka, Marko Salmenkivi
Inf. Retr.3
2003 Topic Detection and Tracking with Spatio-Temporal Evidence
Juha Makkonen, Helena Ahonen-Myka, Marko Salmenkivi
ECIR3
2001 Finding simple intensity descriptions from event sequence data
abstract
Sequences of events are an important type of data arising in various applications, including telecommunications, bio-statistics, web access analysis, etc. A basic approach to modeling such sequences is to find the underlying intensity functions describing the expected number of events per time unit. Typically, the intensity functions are assumed to be piecewise constant. We therefore consider different ways of fitting intensity models to event sequence data. We start by considering a Bayesian approach using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods with varying number of pieces. These methods can be used to produce posterior distributions on the intensity functions and they can also accomodate covariates. The drawback is that they are computationally intensive and thus are not very suitable for data mining applications in which large numbers of intensity functions have to be estimated. We consider dynamic programming approaches to finding the change points in the intensity functions. These methods can find the maximum likelihood intensity function in O(n2k) time for a sequence of n events and k different pieces of intensity. We show that simple heuristics can be used to prune the number of potential change points, yielding speedups of several orders of magnitude. The results of the improved dynamic programming method correspond very closely with the posterior averages produced by the MCMC methods.
Heikki Mannila, Marko Salmenkivi
KDD2