Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ted Sandler
dblp:s/TedSandler
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 40% Learning theory · 40% Information extraction and text analysis · 6% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data integration and cleaning · 33% Data mining · 33% Information retrieval · 33% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
contextual bandit |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Bayesian Counterfactual Risk Minimization · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit › contextual bandit
counterfactual risk minimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Bayesian Counterfactual Risk Minimization · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Bayesian Counterfactual Risk Minimization · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC-Bayesian analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Bayesian Counterfactual Risk Minimization · ICML 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
regulatory genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | A predictive model for identifying mini-regulatory modules in the mouse genome · Bioinform. 2009 |
Data integration and cleaning
entity resolution |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Resolving Identity Uncertainty with Learned Random Walks · ICDM 2009 |
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Resolving Identity Uncertainty with Learned Random Walks · ICDM 2009 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models
random walk models |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Resolving Identity Uncertainty with Learned Random Walks · ICDM 2009 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
feature similarity |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Regularized Learning with Networks of Features · NIPS 2008 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph regularization |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Regularized Learning with Networks of Features · NIPS 2008 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
regularized learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Regularized Learning with Networks of Features · NIPS 2008 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Automatic term list generation for entity tagging · Bioinform. 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
comparative genomics |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | A predictive model for identifying mini-regulatory modules in the mouse genome · Bioinform. 2009 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Regularized Learning with Networks of Features · NIPS 2008 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Regularized Learning with Networks of Features · NIPS 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variance regularization · 0.4inverse propensity score · 0.4systems model integration · 0.1supervised relation weighting · 0.1spectral clustering · 0.1random walk · 0.1machine learning · 0.1manifold learning · 0.1graph regularization · 0.1shallow parsing · 0.1distributional clustering · 0.1conditional random field · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Boosted Off-Policy LearningabstractWe propose the first boosting algorithm for off-policy learning from logged bandit feedback. Unlike existing boosting methods for supervised learning, our algorithm directly optimizes an estimate of the policy’s expected reward. We analyze this algorithm and prove that the excess empirical risk decreases (possibly exponentially fast) with each round of boosting, provided a “weak” learning condition is satisfied by the base learner. We further show how to reduce the base learner to supervised learning, which opens up a broad range of readily available base learners with practical benefits, such as decision trees. Experiments indicate that our algorithm inherits many desirable properties of tree-based boosting algorithms (e.g., robustness to feature scaling and hyperparameter tuning), and that it can outperform off-policy learning with deep neural networks as well as methods that simply regress on the observed rewards. Ben London 0001, Levi Lu, Ted Sandler, Thorsten Joachims |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2019 | Bayesian Counterfactual Risk MinimizationabstractWe present a Bayesian view of counterfactual risk minimization (CRM) for offline learning from logged bandit feedback. Using PAC-Bayesian analysis, we derive a new generalization bound for the truncated inverse propensity score estimator. We apply the bound to a class of Bayesian policies, which motivates a novel, potentially data-dependent, regularization technique for CRM. Experimental results indicate that this technique outperforms standard $L_2$ regularization, and that it is competitive with variance regularization while being both simpler to implement and more computationally efficient. Ben London 0001, Ted Sandler |
ICML | 2 |
| 2009 | Resolving Identity Uncertainty with Learned Random WalksabstractA pervasive problem in large relational databases is identity uncertainty which occurs when multiple entries in a database refer to the same underlying entity in the world. Relational databases exhibit rich graphical structure and are naturally modeled as graphs whose nodes represent entities and whose typed-edges represent relations between them. We propose using random walk models for resolving identity uncertainty since they have proven effective for finding points which are proximately located in a network. Because not all types of relations are equally helpful in alleviating identity uncertainty, we develop a supervised approach to learning the usefulness of different database relations from a training set of database entries whose true identities are known. When tested on the task of resolving uncertainty of ambiguously named authors in bibliographical data, the learned random walk models yield performance superior to support vector machines, and to a related spectral clustering method. Ted Sandler, Lyle H. Ungar, Koby Crammer |
ICDM | 1 |
| 2009 | A predictive model for identifying mini-regulatory modules in the mouse genomeabstractMOTIVATION: Rapidly advancing genome technology has allowed access to a large number of diverse genomes and annotation data. We have defined a systems model that integrates assembly data, comparative genomics, gene predictions, mRNA and EST alignments and physiological tissue expression. Using these as predictive parameters, we engineered a machine learning approach to decipher putative active regions in the genome. RESULTS: Analysis of genomic sequences showed nucleosome-free region (NFR) modules containing a higher percentage of conserved regions, RNA-encoding sequences, CpG islands, splice sites and GC-rich areas. In contrast, random in silico fragments revealed higher percentages of DNA repeats and a lower conservation. The larger conserved sequences from the Vista enhancer browser (VEB) showed a greater percentage of short DNA sequence matches and RNA coding regions in multiple species. Our model can predict small regulatory regions in the genome with >95% prediction accuracy using NFR modules and >85% prediction accuracy with VEB elements. Ultimately, this systems model can be applied to any organism to identify candidate transcriptional modules on a genome scale. Mahesh Yaragatti, Ted Sandler, Lyle H. Ungar |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2008 | Protein-Protein Interaction Network Alignment by Quantitative SimulationabstractWe adapt a network simulation algorithm called quantitative simulation (QSim) for use in the alignment of biological networks. Unlike most network alignment methods, QSim finds local matches for one network in another, making it asymmetric, and takes full advantage of different edge types. We use QSim to simulate a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network from D. melanogaster using a PPI network from S. cerevisiae, and compare QSim's alignment to those from other methods using Gene Ontology (GO) biological process annotations as proxies for correct alignment matches. The best cross-species protein matches obtained from QSim have a higher agreement in GO biological process annotations than those from either BLAST or an alternative network alignment algorithm. Perry Evans, Ted Sandler, Lyle H. Ungar |
BIBM | 2 |
| 2008 | Multiway Clustering for Creating Biomedical Term SetsabstractWe present an EM-based clustering method that can be used for constructing or augmenting ontologies such as MeSH. Our algorithm simultaneously clusters verbs and nouns using both verb-noun and noun-noun co-occurrence pairs. This strategy provides greater coverage of words than using either set of pairs alone, since not all words appear in both datasets. We demonstrate it on data extracted from Medline and evaluate the results using MeSH and Wordnet. Vasileios Kandylas, Lyle H. Ungar, Ted Sandler, Shane T. Jensen |
BIBM | 3 |
| 2008 | Regularized Learning with Networks of FeaturesabstractFor many supervised learning problems, we possess prior knowledge about which features yield similar information about the target variable. In predicting the topic of a document, we might know that two words are synonyms, or when performing image recognition, we know which pixels are adjacent. Such synonymous or neighboring features are near-duplicates and should therefore be expected to have similar weights in a good model. Here we present a framework for regularized learning in settings where one has prior knowledge about which features are expected to have similar and dissimilar weights. This prior knowledge is encoded as a graph whose vertices represent features and whose edges represent similarities and dissimilarities between them. During learning, each feature's weight is penalized by the amount it differs from the average weight of its neighbors. For text classification, regularization using graphs of word co-occurrences outperforms manifold learning and compares favorably to other recently proposed semi-supervised learning methods. For sentiment analysis, feature graphs constructed from declarative human knowledge, as well as from auxiliary task learning, significantly improve prediction accuracy. Ted Sandler, John Blitzer, Partha P. Talukdar, Lyle H. Ungar |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2006 | Automatic term list generation for entity taggingabstractMOTIVATION: Many entity taggers and information extraction systems make use of lists of terms of entities such as people, places, genes or chemicals. These lists have traditionally been constructed manually. We show that distributional clustering methods which group words based on the contexts that they appear in, including neighboring words and syntactic relations extracted using a shallow parser, can be used to aid in the construction of term lists. RESULTS: Experiments on learning lists of terms and using them as part of a gene tagger on a corpus of abstracts from the scientific literature show that our automatically generated term lists significantly boost the precision of a state-of-the-art CRF-based gene tagger to a degree that is competitive with using hand curated lists and boosts recall to a degree that surpasses that of the hand-curated lists. Our results also show that these distributional clustering methods do not generate lists as helpful as those generated by supervised techniques, but that they can be used to complement supervised techniques so as to obtain better performance. AVAILABILITY: The code used in this paper is available from http://www.cis.upenn.edu/datamining/software_dist/autoterm/ Ted Sandler, Andrew I. Schein, Lyle H. Ungar |
Bioinform. | 1 |