EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joseph F. Traub
dblp:t/JFTraub
· DBLP profile ↗
46ranked-venue papers
22as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 34 · 17 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 10 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
9 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 37% Algorithms and data structures · 32% Computational complexity · 29% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 100% |
Topics — the 24 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity
lower bounds |
0.0 | 2 | 1984 | On the Optimal Solution of Large Linear Systems · J. ACM 1984 Optimal Order of One-Point and Multipoint Iteration · J. ACM 1974 |
Privacy and data protection
statistical database |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | The Statistical Security of a Statistical Database · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1984 |
Privacy and data protection
statistical database privacy |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | The Statistical Security of a Statistical Database · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1984 |
Computational complexity
algebraic complexity |
0.0 | 2 | 1980 | On the Complexity of Composition and Generalized Composition of Power Series · SIAM J. Comput. 1980 All Algebraic Functions Can Be Computed Fast · J. ACM 1978 |
Mathematical optimization › iterative methods
krylov subspace methods |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | On the Optimal Solution of Large Linear Systems · J. ACM 1984 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
linear system solving |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | On the Optimal Solution of Large Linear Systems · J. ACM 1984 |
Mathematical optimization
root finding |
0.0 | 2 | 1979 | Convergence and Complexity of Newton Iteration for Operator Equations · J. ACM 1979 Optimal Order of One-Point and Multipoint Iteration · J. ACM 1974 |
Algorithms and data structures › symbolic computation › computational algebra
algebraic algorithms |
0.0 | 1 | 1980 | On the Complexity of Composition and Generalized Composition of Power Series · SIAM J. Comput. 1980 |
Mathematical optimization
iterative methods |
0.0 | 3 | 1976 | Optimal Order of One-Point and Multipoint Iteration · J. ACM 1974 Computational Complexity of Iterative Processes · SIAM J. Comput. 1972 Accelerated Iterative Methods for the Solution of Tridiagonal Systems on Parallel Computers · J. ACM 1976 |
Computational complexity
complexity |
0.0 | 1 | 1979 | Convergence and Complexity of Newton Iteration for Operator Equations · J. ACM 1979 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization › second-order methods
newton's method |
0.0 | 1 | 1979 | Convergence and Complexity of Newton Iteration for Operator Equations · J. ACM 1979 |
Algorithms and data structures
symbolic computation |
0.0 | 1 | 1978 | All Algebraic Functions Can Be Computed Fast · J. ACM 1978 |
Algorithms and data structures › symbolic computation › computational algebra
polynomial evaluation |
0.0 | 2 | 1974 | On the Number of Multiplications for the Evaluation of a Polynomial and Some of Its Derivatives · J. ACM 1974 On Euclid's Algorithm and the Theory of Subresultants · J. ACM 1971 |
High-performance computing
numerical linear algebra |
0.0 | 1 | 1976 | Accelerated Iterative Methods for the Solution of Tridiagonal Systems on Parallel Computers · J. ACM 1976 |
High-performance computing
parallel numerical algorithms |
0.0 | 1 | 1976 | Accelerated Iterative Methods for the Solution of Tridiagonal Systems on Parallel Computers · J. ACM 1976 |
High-performance computing › sparse linear solver
tridiagonal solver |
0.0 | 1 | 1976 | Accelerated Iterative Methods for the Solution of Tridiagonal Systems on Parallel Computers · J. ACM 1976 |
Mathematical optimization › iterative methods
conjugate gradient method |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | On the Optimal Solution of Large Linear Systems · J. ACM 1984 |
Algorithms and data structures › symbolic computation › computational algebra › algebraic algorithms
multiplication complexity |
0.0 | 1 | 1974 | On the Number of Multiplications for the Evaluation of a Polynomial and Some of Its Derivatives · J. ACM 1974 |
Mathematical optimization › root finding
multipoint iteration |
0.0 | 1 | 1974 | Optimal Order of One-Point and Multipoint Iteration · J. ACM 1974 |
Algorithms and data structures
numerical algorithms |
0.0 | 1 | 1974 | Optimal Order of One-Point and Multipoint Iteration · J. ACM 1974 |
Distributed computing theory › distributed algorithms
function computation |
0.0 | 1 | 1972 | Computational Complexity of Iterative Processes · SIAM J. Comput. 1972 |
Algorithms and data structures › number-theoretic algorithms
euclidean algorithm |
0.0 | 1 | 1971 | On Euclid's Algorithm and the Theory of Subresultants · J. ACM 1971 |
Information retrieval › information filtering
selective dissemination of information |
0.0 | 1 | 1969 | MERCURY: H system for the computer-aided distribution of technical reports · J. ACM 1969 |
Mathematical optimization
banach space |
0.0 | 1 | 1979 | Convergence and Complexity of Newton Iteration for Operator Equations · J. ACM 1979 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
matrix-vector multiplication · 0.0chebyshev's inequality · 0.0repeated squaring · 0.0logarithm and exponential representation · 0.0convergence analysis · 0.0newton's method · 0.0newton polygon process · 0.0newton iteration · 0.0iterative methods · 0.0iterative method · 0.0derivative-free iteration · 0.0complexity analysis · 0.0structured vocabulary matching · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Bernd Carl, Aicke Hinrichs, and Philipp Rudolph share the 2014 Best Paper Award
Erich Novak, Klaus Ritter 0001, Ian Hugh Sloan, Joseph F. Traub, Henryk Wozniakowski |
J. Complex. | 4 |
| 2015 | Tino Ullrich Wins the 2014 Information-Based Complexity Young Researcher Award
Erich Novak, Ian Hugh Sloan, Klaus Ritter 0001, Joseph F. Traub, Henryk Wozniakowski |
J. Complex. | 4 |
| 2014 | Shu Tezuka, Joos Heintz, Bart Kuijpers, and Andrés Rojas Paredes Share the 2013 Best Paper Award
Erich Novak, Ian Hugh Sloan, Joseph F. Traub, Henryk Wozniakowski |
J. Complex. | 3 |
| 2014 | Frances Kuo Wins the 2014 Information-Based Complexity Prize
Erich Novak, Ian Hugh Sloan, Joseph F. Traub, Henryk Wozniakowski |
J. Complex. | 3 |
| 2014 | Christoph Aistleitner Wins the 2013 Information-Based Complexity Young Researcher Award
Erich Novak, Ian Hugh Sloan, Joseph F. Traub, Henryk Wozniakowski |
J. Complex. | 3 |
| 2014 | Announcement
Erich Novak, Ian Hugh Sloan, Joseph F. Traub, Henryk Wozniakowski |
J. Complex. | 3 |
| 2012 | What is the Right Computational Model for Continuous Scientific Problems?abstractWe address the view about using the Turing Machine model and the real number model for solving continuous scientific problems. Furthermore we will argue that the Turing Machine is the wrong model of computation for the continuous problems of science. Joseph F. Traub |
Comput. J. | 1 |
| 2012 | Thomas Daun, Leszek Plaskota, Greg W. Wasilkowski Win the 2011 Best Paper Award
Erich Novak, Ian Hugh Sloan, Joseph F. Traub, Henryk Wozniakowski |
J. Complex. | 3 |
| 2011 | Aicke Hinrichs, Simon Foucart, Alain Pajor, Holger Rauhut, Tino Ullrich win the 2010 Best Paper Award
Erich Novak, Ian Hugh Sloan, Joseph F. Traub, Henryk Wozniakowski |
J. Complex. | 3 |
| 2009 | Changes to the Editorial Board
Erich Novak, Ian Hugh Sloan, Joseph F. Traub, Henryk Wozniakowski |
J. Complex. | 3 |
| 2009 | Editorial Board Changes
Joseph F. Traub |
J. Complex. | 1 |
| 2009 | Our Silver Anniversary
Joseph F. Traub |
J. Complex. | 1 |
| 2007 | From the Editors
Harald Niederreiter, Joseph F. Traub, Henryk Wozniakowski |
J. Complex. | 2 |
| 2005 | Guest editors' preface
Askold Khovanskii, Pascal Koiran, Teresa Krick, Gregorio Malajovich, Joseph F. Traub |
J. Complex. | 5 |
| 2004 | From the Editors
Harald Niederreiter, Joseph F. Traub, Henryk Wozniakowski |
J. Complex. | 2 |
| 2002 | 2001 Best Paper Award
Harald Niederreiter, Joseph F. Traub, Henryk Wozniakowski |
J. Complex. | 2 |
| 2002 | FROM THE EDITOR
Joseph F. Traub |
J. Complex. | 1 |
| 2001 | ANNOUNCEMENT: 2000 Best Paper Award
Harald Niederreiter, Joseph F. Traub, Henryk Wozniakowski |
J. Complex. | 2 |
| 2001 | Quantum Computing
Joseph F. Traub |
J. Complex. | 1 |
| 2000 | From the Editor
Joseph F. Traub |
J. Complex. | 1 |
| 2000 | From the Editor
Joseph F. Traub |
J. Complex. | 1 |
| 1999 | From the Editor
Joseph F. Traub |
J. Complex. | 1 |
| 1997 | Best Paper Award
Joseph F. Traub |
J. Complex. | 1 |
| 1997 | A Note from the Editor
Joseph F. Traub |
J. Complex. | 1 |
| 1992 | Measures of uncertainty and information in computation
Edward W. Packel, Joseph F. Traub, Henryk Wozniakowski |
Inf. Sci. | 2 |
| 1991 | Information-Based Complexity: Recent Results and Open Problems
Joseph F. Traub |
FCT | 1 |
| 1991 | Solvability of III-posed problems: An historical note
Joseph F. Traub |
J. Complex. | 1 |
| 1986 | From the Editor
Joseph F. Traub |
J. Complex. | 1 |
| 1985 | Why a journal of complexity?
Joseph F. Traub |
J. Complex. | 1 |
| 1985 | Complexity of approximately solved problems
Joseph F. Traub |
J. Complex. | 1 |
| 1985 | From the editor
Joseph F. Traub |
J. Complex. | 1 |
| 1984 | On the Optimal Solution of Large Linear SystemsabstractThe information-based study of the optimal solution of large linear systems is initiated by studying the case of Krylov information. Among the algorithms that use Krylov information are minimal residual, conjugate gradient, Chebyshev, and successive approximation algorithms. A "sharp" lower bound on the number of matrix-vector multiplications required to compute an å-approximation is obtained for any orthogonally invariant class of matrices. Examples of such classes include many of practical interest such as symmetric matrices, symmetric positive definite matrices, and matrices with bounded condition number. It is shown that the minimal residual algorithm is within at most one matrix-vector multiplication of the lower bound. A similar result is obtained for the generalized minimal residual algorithm. The lower bound is computed for certain classes of orthogonally invariant matrices. How the lack of certam properties (symmetry, positive definiteness) increases the lower bound is shown. A conjecture and a number of open problems are stated. Joseph F. Traub, Henryk Wozniakowski |
J. ACM | 1 |
| 1984 | Average Case Optimality for Linear Problems
Joseph F. Traub, Grzegorz W. Wasilkowski, Henryk Wozniakowski |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 1 |
| 1984 | The Statistical Security of a Statistical DatabaseabstractThis note proposes a statistical perturbation scheme to protect a statistical database against compromise. The proposed scheme can handle the security of numerical as well as nonnumerical sensitive fields. Furthermore, knowledge of some records in a database does not help to compromise unknown records. We use Chebyshev's inequality to analyze the trade-offs among the magnitude of the perturbations, the error incurred by statistical queries, and the size of the query set to which they apply. We show that if the statistician is given absolute error guarantees, then a compromise is possible, but the cost is made exponential in the size of the database. Joseph F. Traub, Yechiam Yemini, Henryk Wozniakowski |
ACM Trans. Database Syst. | 1 |
| 1980 | On the Complexity of Composition and Generalized Composition of Power SeriesabstractLet $F(x) = f_1 x + f_2 x^2 + \cdots $ be a formal power series over a field $\Delta $ Let $F^{[0]} (x) = x$ and for $q = 1,2, \cdots $ , define $F^{[q]} (x) = F^{[q - 1]} (F(x))$. The obvious algorithm for computing the first n terms of $F^{[q]} (x)$ is by the composition analogue of repeated squaring. This algorithm has complexity about $\log _2 q$ times that of a single composition. Brent showed that the factor $\log _2 q$ can be eliminated in the computation of the first n terms of $(F(x))^q $ by a change of representation, using the logarithm and exponential functions. We show the factor $\log _2 q$ can also be eliminated for the composition problem, unless the complexity of composition is quasi-linear. $F^{[q]} (x)$ can often, but not always, be defined for more general q. We give algorithms and complexity bounds for computing the first n terms of $F^{[q]} (x)$ whenever it is defined. We conclude the paper with some open problems. Richard P. Brent, Joseph F. Traub |
SIAM J. Comput. | 2 |
| 1979 | Convergence and Complexity of Newton Iteration for Operator EquationsabstractAn optmaal convergence condmon for Newton ~teratmn m a Banach space ts estabhshed It ~s shown that there exist problems for whtch the ~teraUon converges but the complextty ts unbounded Thus for actual computation convergence ~s not enough What stronger condmon must be unposed to also assure "good complextty" ~s shown KEY WORDS AND PHRASES Newton ~teratton, operator equations, optunal algontlun, convergence, complexity CR CATEGORIES 5 15, 5 25 IntroductwnNumerous papers have analyzed sufficient conditions for the convergence of algonthms for the solution of nonlinear problems.In addRion to convergence, we consider another fundamental question.What stronger conditions must be imposed to assure "good complexity?"This is deafly one of the crucial issues (m addmon to stability) if one is interested in actual computation.We beheve it is also a most interesting theoretical quesUon.We consider Newton iteration for a simple zero of a nonlinear operator in a Banach space of finite or infmite dimension.We establish the opUmal radius of the ball of convergence with respect to a certain functional.There exist problems where the iteration converges but the complexity increases logarithmically to infinity as the initial iterate approaches the boundary of the ball of convergence.(This phenomenon does not occur in the Kantorovich theory of operator equations; see Section 3.) We estabhsh the optimal radius of the ball of good complexity.In this paper we limit ourselves to the important case of Newton iteration.In other papers [8-10] we study optimal convergence and complexRy for classes of iterations.We summarize the results of this paper.Definitions and theorems concerning the optimal ball of convergence are given in Section 2. We conclude this section by giving conditions under which the radius of the ball of convergence is a constant fraction of the radius of the ball of analytioty of the operator.Complexity of Newton iteration ~s studied in Secuon 3. We show that Newton iteration may converge but have arbitrarily high complexity and conjecture that thts is a general phenomenon.We establish the radms of the ball of good complexity as well as a lower bound on the complexity of Newton iteration. Convergence of Newton IterationWe consider the solution of the nonlinear equation Permission to copy wRhout fee all or part of this material ~s granted prowded that the copies are not made or distributed for direct ccommercml advantage, the ACM copyright notice and the title of the publicatton and its date appear, and nottce ts given that copying Is by permtsslon of the AssocmUon for Computmg Machinery To copy otherwtse, or to repubhsh, reqmres a fee and/or speofic permlsston This research was supported m part by the Nauonal Science Foundation under Grant MCS75-222-55 and the Office of Naval Research under Contract N0014-76-C-0370, Joseph F. Traub, Henryk Wozniakowski |
J. ACM | 1 |
| 1978 | All Algebraic Functions Can Be Computed FastabstractThe expansions of algebraic functions can be computed "fast" using the Newton Polygon Process and any "normal" iteration Let M(I) be the number of operations sufficient to multiply two/thdegree polynomials It is shown that the first N terms of an expansion of any algebraic function defined by an nth-degree polynomial can be computed in O(nM(N)) operations, while the classical method needs O(N ~) operations Among the numerous apphcatlons of algebraic functions are symbolic mathematics and combinatorial analysis Reversion, reciprocation, and nth root of a polynomial are all special cases of algebraic functions H. T. Kung 0001, Joseph F. Traub |
J. ACM | 2 |
| 1977 | Selection of Good Algorithms from a Family of Algorithms for Polynomial Derivative Evaluation
Mary Shaw, Joseph F. Traub |
Inf. Process. Lett. | 2 |
| 1976 | Accelerated Iterative Methods for the Solution of Tridiagonal Systems on Parallel ComputersabstractIterative methods for the solution of tridiagonal systems are considered, and a new iteration is presented, whose rate of convergence is comparable to that of the optimal two-cyclic Chebyshev iteration but which does not require the calculation of optimal parameters. The convergence rate depends only on the magnitude of the elements of the tridiagonal matrix and not on its dimension or spectrum. The theory also has a natural extension to block tridiagonal systems. Numerical experiments suggest that on a parallel computer this new algorithm is the best of the iterative algorithms considered. Don Eric Heller, D. K. Stevenson, Joseph F. Traub |
J. ACM | 3 |
| 1975 | Principles for Testing Polynomial Zerofinding ProgramsabstractThe state of the art in polynomial zerofinding algorithms and programs is briefly summarized, with emphasis on the principles for testing such programs.The authors view testing as requiring four stages: (1) testing program robustness, (2) testing for convergence difficulties, (3) testing for specific weakness of the algorithms, (4) assessment of program performance by statistical testing.It is emphasized that the statistical testing must be done with care.There are many ways to generate "random" polynomials, b r t two classes of random polynomials which have been widely used are of only limited usefulness in terms of evaluating reliability or performance because they produce polynomials with very similar characteristics.Classes of random polynomials which should be used are discussed. Michael A. Jenkins, Joseph F. Traub |
ACM Trans. Math. Softw. | 2 |
| 1974 | Optimal Order of One-Point and Multipoint IterationabstractThe problem is to calculate a simple zero of a nonlinear function ƒ by iteration. There is exhibited a family of iterations of order 2 n -1 which use n evaluations of ƒ and no derivative evaluations, as well as a second family of iterations of order 2 n -1 based on n — 1 evaluations of ƒ and one of ƒ′. In particular, with four evaluations an iteration of eighth order is constructed. The best previous result for four evaluations was fifth order. It is proved that the optimal order of one general class of multipoint iterations is 2 n -1 and that an upper bound on the order of a multipoint iteration based on n evaluations of ƒ (no derivatives) is 2 n . It is conjectured that a multipoint iteration without memory based on n evaluations has optimal order 2 n -1 . H. T. Kung 0001, Joseph F. Traub |
J. ACM | 2 |
| 1974 | On the Number of Multiplications for the Evaluation of a Polynomial and Some of Its DerivativesabstractA family of new algorithms is given for evaluating the first m derivatives of a polynomial. In particular, it is shown that all derivatives may be evaluated in 3 n - 2 multiplications. The best previous result required 1/2 n ( n + 1) multiplications. Some optimality results are presented. Mary Shaw, Joseph F. Traub |
J. ACM | 2 |
| 1972 | Computational Complexity of Iterative ProcessesabstractThe theory of optimal algorithmic processes is part of computational complexity. This paper deals with analytic computational complexity. The relation between the goodness of an iteration algorithm and its new function evaluation and memory requirements are analyzed. A new conjecture is stated. Joseph F. Traub |
SIAM J. Comput. | 1 |
| 1971 | On Euclid's Algorithm and the Theory of SubresultantsabstractThis paper presents an elementary treatment of the theory of subresultants, and examines the relationship of the subresultants of a given pair of polynomials to their polynomial remainder sequence as determined by Euclid's algorithm.Two important versions of Euclid's algorithm are discussed.The results are essentially the same as those of Collins, but the presentation is briefer, simpler, and somewhat more general. W. S. Brown, Joseph F. Traub |
J. ACM | 2 |
| 1969 | MERCURY: H system for the computer-aided distribution of technical reportsabstractMERCURY is a computer-aided system for the selective distribution of Bell Telephone Laboratories technical reports to employees. MERCURY is based on the idea that the job of distribution should be divided between the author and the reader with each performing that part of the job which he does best. The author is asked to describe the interests of the readers to whom his report should be sent. The reader is asked to described the reports that he wishes to receive. The descriptions are made from a small structured vocabulary. The matching of report to reader and the printing of address labels is done by computer. W. S. Brown, Joseph F. Traub |
J. ACM | 2 |
| 1966 | Notice: Newsletter for Numerical AnalystsabstractSome possible combinations of courses Joseph F. Traub |
Comput. J. | 1 |