Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rodney W. Topor

dblp:t/RWTopor · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
30ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 16 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 9Theory of computation · 6 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Security and privacy · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers
Data mining · 88% Data models and query languages · 8% Information retrieval · 3%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
description logic
0.222010
Revising General Knowledge Bases in Description Logics · KR 2010
A New Approach to Knowledge Base Revision in DL-Lite · AAAI 2010
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › belief revision
knowledge base revision
0.222010
Revising General Knowledge Bases in Description Logics · KR 2010
A New Approach to Knowledge Base Revision in DL-Lite · AAAI 2010
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › description logic
DL-Lite
0.112010
A New Approach to Knowledge Base Revision in DL-Lite · AAAI 2010
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology
0.112010
A New Approach to Knowledge Base Revision in DL-Lite · AAAI 2010
Logic in computer science
belief revision
0.112010
Revising General Knowledge Bases in Description Logics · KR 2010
Data mining › pattern mining
association rule mining
0.122002
Construct robust rule sets for classification · KDD 2002
Mining the Smallest Association Rule Set for Predictions · ICDM 2001
Data mining › pattern mining › association rule mining
class association rules
0.012002
Construct robust rule sets for classification · KDD 2002
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification
0.012002
Construct robust rule sets for classification · KDD 2002
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
rule learning
0.012002
Construct robust rule sets for classification · KDD 2002
Parallel and multicore computing
data permutation
0.012002
Permutation-Based Range-Join Algorithms on N-Dimensional Meshes · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2002
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel architecture
mesh-connected computer
0.012002
Permutation-Based Range-Join Algorithms on N-Dimensional Meshes · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2002
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel query processing
parallel join algorithms
0.012002
Permutation-Based Range-Join Algorithms on N-Dimensional Meshes · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2002
Data mining › pattern mining › association rule mining
non-redundant association rules
0.012001
Mining the Smallest Association Rule Set for Predictions · ICDM 2001
Data models and query languages › query language
domain independence
0.021991
Safety and Translation of Relational Calculus Queries · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1991
Safety and Correct Translation of Relational Calculus Formulas · PODS 1987
Data mining › pattern mining › itemset mining
frequent itemset mining
0.012001
Mining the Smallest Association Rule Set for Predictions · ICDM 2001
Information retrieval › cross-language information retrieval
query translation
0.011991
Safety and Translation of Relational Calculus Queries · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1991
Data models and query languages › query language
relational calculus
0.011991
Safety and Translation of Relational Calculus Queries · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model-based belief revision · 0.1feature-based semantics · 0.1association rule mining · 0.1sorting · 0.0heuristic approximation · 0.0data permutation · 0.0translation algorithms · 0.0safety analysis · 0.0relational calculus · 0.0equality · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 DL-Lite Ontology Revision Based on An Alternative Semantic Characterization
abstract
Ontology engineering and maintenance require (semi-)automated ontology change operations. Intensive research has been conducted on TBox and ABox changes in description logics (DLs), and various change operators have been proposed in the literature. Existing operators largely fall into two categories: syntax-based and model-based. While each approach has its advantages and disadvantages, an important topic that has rarely been explored is how to achieve a balance between syntax-based and model-based approaches. Also, most existing operators are specially designed for either TBox change or ABox change, and cannot handle the general ontology revision task—given a DL knowledge base (KB, a pair consisting of a TBox and an ABox), how to revise it by a set of TBox and ABox axioms ( i.e. , a new DL KB). In this article, we introduce an alternative structure for DL-Lite, called a featured interpretation, and show that featured models provide a finite and tight characterization to the classical semantics of DL-Lite. A key issue for defining a change operator is the so-called expressibility, that is, whether a set of models (or featured models here) is axiomatizable in DLs. It is indeed much easier to obtain expressibility results for featured models than for classical DL models. As a result, the new semantics determined by featured models provides a method for defining and studying various changes of DL-Lite KBs that involve both TBoxes and ABoxes. To demonstrate the usefulness of the new semantic characterization in ontology change, we define two revision operators for DL-Lite KBs using featured models and study their properties. In particular, we show that our two operators both satisfy AGM postulates. We show that the complexity of our revisions is Π P 2 -complete, that is, on the same level as major revision operators in propositional logic, which further justifies the feasibility of our revision approach for DL-Lite. Also, we develop algorithms for these DL-Lite revisions.
Zhe Wang 0001, Kewen Wang 0001, Rodney W. Topor
ACM Trans. Comput. Log.3
2014 Eliminating Concepts and Roles from Ontologies in Expressive Descriptive Logics
abstract
Forgetting is an important tool for reducing ontologies by eliminating some redundant concepts and roles while preserving sound and complete reasoning. Attempts have previously been made to address the problem of forgetting in relatively simple description logics (DLs), such as DL‐Lite and extended . However, the issue of forgetting for ontologies in more expressive DLs, such as and OWL DL, is largely unexplored. In particular, the problem of characterizing and computing forgetting for such logics is still open. In this paper, we first define semantic forgetting about concepts and roles in ontologies and state several important properties of forgetting in this setting. We then define the result of forgetting for concept descriptions in , state the properties of forgetting for concept descriptions, and present algorithms for computing the result of forgetting for concept descriptions. Unlike the case of DL‐Lite, the result of forgetting for an ontology does not exist in general, even for the special case of forgetting in TBoxes. This makes the problem of computing the result of forgetting in more challenging. We address this problem by defining a series of approximations to the result of forgetting for ontologies and studying their properties. Our algorithms for computing approximations can be directly implemented as a plug‐in of an ontology editor to enhance its ability of managing and reasoning in (large) ontologies.
Kewen Wang 0001, Zhe Wang 0001, Rodney W. Topor, Jeff Z. Pan, Grigoris Antoniou
Comput. Intell.3
2010 A New Approach to Knowledge Base Revision in DL-Lite
abstract
Revising knowledge bases (KBs) in description logics (DLs) in a syntax-independent manner is an important, nontrivial problem for the ontology management and DL communities. Several attempts have been made to adapt classical model-based belief revision and update techniques to DLs, but they are restricted in several ways. In particular, they do not provide operators or algorithms for general DL KB revision. The key difficulty is that, unlike propositional logic, a DL KB may have infinitely many models with complex (and possibly infinite) structures, making it difficult to define and compute revisions in terms of models. In this paper, we study general KBs in a specific DL in the DL-Lite family. We introduce the concept of features for such KBs, develop an alternative semantic characterization of KBs using features (instead of models), define two specific revision operators for KBs, and present the first algorithm for computing best approximations for syntax-independent revisions of KBs.
Zhe Wang 0001, Kewen Wang 0001, Rodney W. Topor
AAAI3
2010 Indexing Temporal Data with Virtual Structure
Bela Stantic, Justin Terry, Rodney W. Topor, Abdul Sattar 0001
ADBIS3
2010 Tableau-based Forgetting in [Ascr ][Lscr ][Cscr ] Ontologies
Zhe Wang 0001, Kewen Wang 0001, Rodney W. Topor, Xiaowang Zhang
ECAI3
2010 Revising General Knowledge Bases in Description Logics
Zhe Wang 0001, Kewen Wang 0001, Rodney W. Topor
KR3
2009 Concept and Role Forgetting in ALC{\mathcal {ALC}} Ontologies
Kewen Wang 0001, Zhe Wang 0001, Rodney W. Topor, Jeff Z. Pan, Grigoris Antoniou
ISWC3
2008 Forgetting Concepts in DL-Lite
Zhe Wang 0001, Kewen Wang 0001, Rodney W. Topor, Jeff Z. Pan
ESWC3
2006 Sanitization of Databases for Refined Privacy Trade-Offs
Ahmed HajYasien, Vladimir Estivill-Castro, Rodney W. Topor
ISI3
2004 Mining Informative Rule Set for Prediction
Jiuyong Li, Hong Shen 0001, Rodney W. Topor
J. Intell. Inf. Syst.3
2002 Rewriting Unions of General Conjunctive Queries Using Views
Junhu Wang, Michael J. Maher, Rodney W. Topor
EDBT3
2002 Construct robust rule sets for classification
abstract
We study the problem of computing classification rule sets from relational databases so that accurate predictions can be made on test data with missing attribute values. Traditional classifiers perform badly when test data are not as complete as the training data because they tailor a training database too much. We introduce the concept of one rule set being more robust than another, that is, able to make more accurate predictions on test data with missing attribute values. We show that the optimal class association rule set is as robust as the complete class association rule set. We then introduce the k-optimal rule set, which provides predictions exactly the same as the optimal class association rule set on test data with up to k missing attribute values. This leads to a hierarchy of k-optimal rule sets in which decreasing size corresponds to decreasing robustness, and they all more robust than a traditional classification rule set. We introduce two methods to find k-optimal rule sets, i.e. an optimal association rule mining approach and a heuristic approximate approach. We show experimentally that a k-optimal rule set generated by the optimal association rule mining approach performs better than that by the heuristic approximate approach and both rule sets perform significantly better than a typical classification rule set (C4.5Rules) on incomplete test data.
Jiuyong Li, Rodney W. Topor, Hong Shen 0001
KDD2
2002 Mining the optimal class association rule set
Jiuyong Li, Hong Shen 0001, Rodney W. Topor
Knowl. Based Syst.3
2002 An efficient algorithm for constructing Hamiltonian paths in meshes
Shao Dong Chen, Hong Shen 0001, Rodney W. Topor
Parallel Comput.3
2002 Permutation-Based Range-Join Algorithms on N-Dimensional Meshes
abstract
We present four efficient parallel algorithms for computing a nonequijoin, called range-join, of two relations on N-dimensional mesh-connected computers. Range-joins of relations R and S are an important generalization of conventional equijoins and band-joins and are solved by permutation-based approaches in all proposed algorithms. In general, after sorting all subsets of both relations, the proposed algorithms permute every sorted subset of relation S to each processor in turn, where it is joined with the local subset of relation R. To permute the subsets of S efficiently, we propose two data permutation approaches, namely, the shifting approach which permutes the data recursively from lower dimensions to higher dimensions and the Hamiltonian-cycle approach which first constructs a Hamiltonian cycle on the mesh and then permutes the data along this cycle by repeatedly transferring data from each processor to its successor. We apply the shifting approach to meshes with different storage capacities which results in two different join algorithms. The basic shifting join (BASHJ) algorithm can minimize the number of subsets stored temporarily at a processor, but requires a large number of data transmissions, while the buffering shifting join (BUSHJ) algorithm can achieve a high parallelism and minimize the number of data transmissions, but requires a large number of subsets stored at each processor.
Shao Dong Chen, Hong Shen 0001, Rodney W. Topor
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.3
2001 Reasoning with Disjunctive Constrained Tuple-Generating Dependencies
Junhu Wang, Rodney W. Topor, Michael J. Maher
DEXA2
2001 Mining the Smallest Association Rule Set for Predictions
abstract
Mining transaction databases for association rules usually generates a large number of rules, most of which are unnecessary when used for subsequent prediction. In this paper we define a rule set for a given transaction database that is much smaller than the association rule set but makes the same predictions as the association rule set by the confidence priority. We call this subset the informative rule set. The informative rule set is not constrained to particular target items; and it is smaller than the non-redundant association rule set. We present an algorithm to directly generate the informative rule set, i.e., without generating all frequent itemsets first, and that accesses the database less often than other unconstrained direct methods. We show experimentally that the informative rule set is much smaller than both the association rule set and the non-redundant association rule set, and that it can be generated more efficiently.
Jiuyong Li, Hong Shen 0001, Rodney W. Topor
ICDM3
2001 Efficient Permutation-Based Range-Join Algorithms on N-Dimensional Meshes
abstract
In this paper, we present two efficient parallel algorithms for computing a non-equijoin, range-join, of two relations an N-dimensional mesh-connected computers. The proposed algorithms uses the data-shifting approach to effectively permute every sorted subset of relation S to each processor in turn recursively in dimensions from low to high, where it is joined with the local subset of relation R.
Shao Dong Chen, Hong Shen 0001, Rodney W. Topor
IPDPS3
2001 Mining Optimal Class Association Rule Set
Jiuyong Li, Hong Shen 0001, Rodney W. Topor
PAKDD3
1995 On the Declarative and Procedural Semantics of Deductive Object-Oriented Systems
Gillian Dobbie, Rodney W. Topor
J. Intell. Inf. Syst.2
1994 An Efficient Permutation-Based Parallel Range-Join Algorithm on N-Dimensional Torus Computers
Shao Dong Chen, Hong Shen 0001, Rodney W. Topor
Inf. Process. Lett.3
1992 Incremental Evaluation of Datalog Queries
Guozhu Dong, Rodney W. Topor
ICDT2
1991 Safety and Translation of Relational Calculus Queries
abstract
Not all queries in relational calculus can be answered sensibly when disjunction, negation, and universal quantification are allowed. The class of relation calculus queries or formulas that have sensible answers is called the domain independent class which is known to be undecidable. Subsequent research has focused on identifying large decidable subclasses of domain independent formulas. In this paper we investigate the properties of two such classes: the evaluable formulas and the allowed formulas. Although both classes have been defined before, we give simplified definitions, present short proofs of their main properties, and describe a method to incorporate equality. Although evaluable queries have sensible answers, it is not straightforward to compute them efficiently or correctly. We introduce relational algebra normal form for formulas from which form the correct translation into relational algebra is trivial. We give algorithms to transform an evaluable formula into an equivalent allowed formula and from there into relational algebra normal form. Our algorithms avoid use of the so-called Dom relation, consisting of all constants appearing in the database or the query. Finally, we describe a restriction under which every domain independent formula is evaluable and argue that the class of evaluable formulas is the largest decidable subclass of the domain independent formulas that can be efficiently recognized.
Allen Van Gelder, Rodney W. Topor
ACM Trans. Database Syst.2
1988 On Domain Independent Disjunctive Databases
Liz Sonenberg, Rodney W. Topor
ICDT2
1988 Inferring Negative Information from Disjunctive Databases
Kenneth A. Ross, Rodney W. Topor
J. Autom. Reason.2
1987 Safety and Correct Translation of Relational Calculus Formulas
abstract
Not all queries in relational calculus can be answered “sensibly” once disjunction, negation, and universal quantification are allowed. The class of relational calculus queries, or formulas, that have “sensible” answers is called the domain independent class, which is known to be undecidable. Subsequent research has focused on identifying large decidable subclasses of domain independent formulas In this paper we investigate the properties of two such classes the evaluable formulas and the allowed formulas. Although both classes have been defined before, we give simplified definitions, present short proofs of their man properties, and describe a method to incorporate equality.
Allen Van Gelder, Rodney W. Topor
PODS2
1987 Domain-Independent Formulas and Databases
Rodney W. Topor
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
1984 Termination Detection for Distributed Computations
Rodney W. Topor
Inf. Process. Lett.1
1982 Functional Programs for Generating Permutations
abstract
This paper presents several functional programs for generating permutations represented as linear linked lists. Exact formulas for the storage used by some of these programs are derived and compared with the theoretical lower bound. Two different programs are shown to be optimal with respect to this measure. Problems considered include generation of all N! permutations of N distinct elements, generation of all permutations of length k≤N, and generation of all distinct permutations of a multiset of N elements.
Rodney W. Topor
Comput. J.1
1979 The Correctness of the Schorr-Waite List Marking Algorithm
Rodney W. Topor
Acta Informatica1