Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ying Yang 0005

dblp:y/YingYang-5 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data integration and cleaning · 72% Data mining · 28%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning › data quality
data debugging
0.412019
Data Debugging and Exploration with Vizier · SIGMOD Conference 2019
Data mining
exploratory data analysis
0.412019
Data Debugging and Exploration with Vizier · SIGMOD Conference 2019
Data integration and cleaning
data curation
0.212015
Lenses: An On-Demand Approach to ETL · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015
Data integration and cleaning
extract-transform-load
0.212015
Lenses: An On-Demand Approach to ETL · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015
Data integration and cleaning
data quality
0.112015
Lenses: An On-Demand Approach to ETL · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spark execution · 0.4python integration · 0.4SQL integration · 0.4probabilistic query processing · 0.2greedy ranking · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Data Debugging and Exploration with Vizier
abstract
We present Vizier, a multi-modal data exploration and debugging tool. The system supports a wide range of operations by seamlessly integrating Python, SQL, and automated data curation and debugging methods. Using Spark as an execution backend, Vizier handles large datasets in multiple formats. Ease-of-use is attained through integration of a notebook with a spreadsheet-style interface and with visualizations that guide and support the user in the loop. In addition, native support for provenance and versioning enable collaboration and uncertainty management. In this demonstration we will illustrate the diverse features of the system using several realistic data science tasks based on real data.
Mike Brachmann, Carlos Bautista, Sonia Castelo Quispe, Su Feng, Juliana Freire, Boris Glavic, Oliver Kennedy, Heiko Müller 0001, Rémi Rampin, William Spoth, Ying Yang 0005
SIGMOD Conference11
2017 Adaptive Schema Databases
William Spoth, Bahareh Arab, Eric S. Chan, Dieter Gawlick, Adel Ghoneimy, Boris Glavic, Beda Christoph Hammerschmidt, Oliver Kennedy, Seokki Lee, Zhen Hua Liu, Xing Niu 0002, Ying Yang 0005
CIDR12
2017 Convergent Interactive Inference with Leaky Joins
Ying Yang 0005, Oliver Kennedy
EDBT1
2015 Lenses: An On-Demand Approach to ETL
abstract
Three mentalities have emerged in analytics. One view holds that reliable analytics is impossible without high-quality data, and relies on heavy-duty ETL processes and upfront data curation to provide it. The second view takes a more ad-hoc approach, collecting data into a data lake, and placing responsibility for data quality on the analyst querying it. A third, on-demand approach has emerged over the past decade in the form of numerous systems like Paygo or HLog, which allow for incremental curation of the data and help analysts to make principled trade-offs between data quality and effort. Though quite useful in isolation, these systems target only specific quality problems (e.g., Paygo targets only schema matching and entity resolution). In this paper, we explore the design of a general, extensible infrastructure for on-demand curation that is based on probabilistic query processing. We illustrate its generality through examples and show how such an infrastructure can be used to gracefully make existing ETL workflows "on-demand". Finally, we present a user interface for On-Demand ETL and address ensuing challenges, including that of efficiently ranking potential data curation tasks. Our experimental results show that On-Demand ETL is feasible and that our greedy ranking strategy for curation tasks, called CPI, is effective.
Ying Yang 0005, Niccolò Meneghetti, Ronny Fehling, Zhen Hua Liu, Oliver Kennedy
Proc. VLDB Endow.1