Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Equity vs. Equality: Optimizing Ranking Fairness for Tailored Provider Needs

sigir26-123 · Full research paper · Yiteng Tu, Weihang Su, Shuguang Han, Yiqun Liu, Qingyao Ai
Fairness Metrics and Evaluation · 50% Evaluation Metrics and User Models · 50%
Abstract

Ranking plays a central role in connecting users and providers in Information Retrieval (IR) systems, making provider-side fairness an important challenge. While recent research has begun to address fairness in ranking, most existing approaches adopt an equality-based perspective, aiming to ensure that providers with similar content receive similar exposure. However, it overlooks the diverse needs of real-world providers, whose utility from ranking may depend not only on exposure but also on outcomes like sales or engagement. Consequently, exposure-based fairness may not accurately capture the true utility perceived by different providers with varying priorities. To this end, we introduce an equity-oriented fairness framework that explicitly models each provider's preferences over key outcomes such as exposure and sales, thus evaluating whether a ranking algorithm can fulfill these individualized goals while maintaining overall fairness across providers. Based on this framework, we develop EquityRank, a gradient-based algorithm that jointly optimizes user-side effectiveness and provider-side equity. Extensive offline and online simulations demonstrate that EquityRank offers improved trade-offs between effectiveness and fairness and adapts to heterogeneous provider needs.

Assigned reviewers

#ReviewerMatchWhy (closest evidence publications in the taxonomy)
1 Theresia Veronika Rampisela
70
70 Evaluation Measures of Individual Item Fairness for Recommender Systems: A Critical Study (2025) Fairness Metrics and Evaluation
70 Can We Trust Recommender System Fairness Evaluation? The Role of Fairness and Relevance (2024) Fairness Metrics and Evaluation
70 Relevance-aware Individual Item Fairness Measures for Recommender Systems: Limitations and Usage Guidelines (2026) Fairness Metrics and Evaluation
2 Sruthi Gorantla
62
70 Sampling Individually-Fair Rankings that are Always Group Fair (2023) Fairness Metrics and Evaluation
70 Optimizing Learning-to-Rank Models for Ex-Post Fair Relevance (2024) Fairness Metrics and Evaluation
70 On the Problem of Underranking in Group-Fair Ranking (2021) Fairness Metrics and Evaluation
3 Leif Azzopardi
50
100 Measuring Bias in a Ranked List Using Term-Based Representations (2024) Evaluation Metrics and User Models
100 Efficiently Estimating Retrievability Bias (2014) Evaluation Metrics and User Models
74 Retrievability Bias Estimation Using Synthetically Generated Queries (2023) Test Collection Construction and Pooling

Area chair

Area chairMatch
Fernando Diaz 0001 45
Area-chair candidates (3)
Fernando Diaz 0001 assigned 4512 papers
Xiaoxue Zang 374 papers
Jun Xu 0001 COI: co-author 362 papers

Candidates from the panel ranked by match score

#ReviewerMatchLoadWhy
1 Theresia Veronika Rampisela assigned 70 3
70 Evaluation Measures of Individual Item Fairness for Recommender Systems: A Critical Study (2025) Fairness Metrics and Evaluation
70 Can We Trust Recommender System Fairness Evaluation? The Role of Fairness and Relevance (2024) Fairness Metrics and Evaluation
2 Tetsuya Sakai COI: co-author 64 3
70 Diversification as Risk Minimization (2026) Evaluation Metrics and User Models
70 Summaries, ranked retrieval and sessions: a unified framework for information access evaluation (2013) Evaluation Metrics and User Models
3 Sruthi Gorantla assigned 62 3
70 Sampling Individually-Fair Rankings that are Always Group Fair (2023) Fairness Metrics and Evaluation
70 Optimizing Learning-to-Rank Models for Ex-Post Fair Relevance (2024) Fairness Metrics and Evaluation
4 Mark D. Smucker 51 3
70 Offline Evaluation by Maximum Similarity to an Ideal Ranking (2020) Evaluation Metrics and User Models
70 Assessing Top- Preferences (2021) Evaluation Metrics and User Models
5 Leif Azzopardi assigned 50 3
100 Measuring Bias in a Ranked List Using Term-Based Representations (2024) Evaluation Metrics and User Models
100 Efficiently Estimating Retrievability Bias (2014) Evaluation Metrics and User Models
6 Zechun Niu COI: co-author 47 3
55 Addressing Personalized Bias for Unbiased Learning to Rank (2025) Unbiased Learning to Rank
45 Investigating the Robustness of Counterfactual Learning to Rank Models: A Reproducibility Study (2025) Unbiased Learning to Rank
7 Yimeng Bai 45 3
62 Recommendation Unlearning via Influence Function (2025) Efficient Training and Data Optimization
43 Leveraging Watch-time Feedback for Short-Video Recommendations: A Causal Labeling Framework (2023) Recommendation Systems and Evaluation
9 Paul Thomas 0001 44 3
73 On the Use of LLMs for Relevance Labelling (2026) LLM-Based Relevance Assessment
62 User Models, Metrics and Measures of Search: A Tutorial on the C/W/L Evaluation Framework (2021) User Behavior and Search Interaction
10 Andrew Parry 43 3
73 Large Language Model Relevance Assessors Agree With One Another More Than With Human Assessors (2025) LLM-Based Relevance Assessment
45 [inline-graphic not available: see fulltext] SuiteEval: Simplifying Retrieval Benchmarks (2026) Retrieval Toolkits and Reproducibility
11 Negar Arabzadeh 40 3
44 Matches Made in Heaven: Toolkit and Large-Scale Datasets for Supervised Query Reformulation (2021) Query Reformulation and Expansion
44 A Reproducibility Study of LLM-Based Query Reformulation (2026) Query Reformulation and Expansion
12 Yifan Wang 0017 COI: co-author 40 3
62 A Survey on the Fairness of Recommender Systems (2023) Popularity Bias and Long-Tail Debiasing
39 Improving Long-tail User CTR Prediction via Hierarchical Distribution Alignment (2025) Bias Mitigation Methods
13 Haritz Puerto 40 3
70 Leaky Thoughts: Large Reasoning Models Are Not Private Thinkers (2025) Fairness Metrics and Evaluation
31 C-SEO Bench: Does Conversational SEO Work? (2025) Reasoning Evaluation and Benchmarks
14 Xiao Wang 0043 COI: co-author 39 3
45 Retrieve, Rerank, Answer, Experiment: Hands-On IR Research with PyTerrier (2026) Retrieval Toolkits and Reproducibility
39 Effective Contrastive Weighting for Dense Query Expansion (2023) Query Reformulation and Expansion
15 Xuanhui Wang COI: co-author 39 3
43 TF-Ranking: Scalable TensorFlow Library for Learning-to-Rank (2019) Retrieval Toolkits and Reproducibility
43 Rax: Composable Learning-to-Rank Using JAX (2022) Retrieval Toolkits and Reproducibility
16 Jizhi Zhang 39 3
54 Is ChatGPT Fair for Recommendation? Evaluating Fairness in Large Language Model Recommendation (2023) Preference Alignment and Optimization
42 On the Theories Behind Hard Negative Sampling for Recommendation (2023) Recommendation Systems and Evaluation
17 Min Hou 0004 39 3
70 Fair Personalized Learner Modeling Without Sensitive Attributes (2025) Fairness Metrics and Evaluation
39 RecCocktail: A Generalizable and Efficient Framework for LLM-Based Recommendation (2026) Preference Alignment and Optimization
18 Chongming Gao 39 3
43 KuaiRec: A Fully-observed Dataset and Insights for Evaluating Recommender Systems (2022) Recommendation Systems and Evaluation
42 On the Theories Behind Hard Negative Sampling for Recommendation (2023) Recommendation Systems and Evaluation
19 Xialong Liu 38 3
70 Fairness-Aware Design for Contextual Experiments: Guaranteeing Reliability and Equity in Heterogeneous Subgroups (2026) Fairness Metrics and Evaluation
42 CROLoss: Towards a Customizable Loss for Retrieval Models in Recommender Systems (2022) Recommendation with Search and Ranking
20 Jaime Arguello 38 3
44 Multilingual and Domain-Agnostic Tip-of-the-Tongue Query Generation for Simulated Evaluation (2026) User Simulation for Interactive Systems
44 Tip of the Tongue Query Elicitation for Simulated Evaluation (2025) User Simulation for Interactive Systems
21 Yang Zhang 0072 38 3
69 Exact and Efficient Unlearning for Large Language Model-Based Recommendation (2025) Efficiency and Deployment
40 Preliminary Study on Incremental Learning for Large Language Model-based Recommender Systems (2024) Efficiency and Deployment
22 Zhen Qin 0001 38 3
43 Improving Recommendation Quality in Google Drive (2020) Recommendation Systems and Evaluation
43 Bootstrapping Recommendations at Chrome Web Store (2021) Recommendation Systems and Evaluation
23 Fan Zhang 0053 COI: co-author 38 3
62 Evaluating Mobile Search with Height-Biased Gain (2017) User Behavior and Search Interaction
49 Incorporating Query Reformulating Behavior into Web Search Evaluation (2021) User Behavior and Search Interaction
24 Rolf Jagerman 38 3
43 Bootstrapping Recommendations at Chrome Web Store (2021) Recommendation Systems and Evaluation
43 Rax: Composable Learning-to-Rank Using JAX (2022) Retrieval Toolkits and Reproducibility
25 Falk Scholer COI: co-author 38 3
42 Can Generative LLMs Create Query Variants for Test Collections? An Exploratory Study (2023) Query Reformulation and Expansion
42 sMARE: a new paradigm to evaluate and understand query performance prediction methods (2022) Query Performance Prediction
26 Daiting Shi 38 3
70 MA4DIV: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Search Result Diversification (2025) Evaluation Metrics and User Models
42 Population-Guided Intent-Aware Query Rewriting for Web Search (2026) Query Reformulation and Expansion
27 Jiqun Liu 37 3
70 Toward A Two-Sided Fairness Framework in Search and Recommendation (2023) Fairness Metrics and Evaluation
41 TRUE: A Reproducible Framework for LLM-Driven Relevance Judgment in Information Retrieval (2026) LLM-Based Relevance Assessment
28 Gustavo Penha 37 3
43 Contextualizing Spotify's Audiobook List Recommendations with Descriptive Shelves (2025) Recommendation Systems and Evaluation
42 Evaluating the Robustness of Retrieval Pipelines with Query Variation Generators (2022) Query Reformulation and Expansion
29 Yuchen Li 0006 37 3
44 FULTR: A Large-Scale Fusion Learning to Rank Dataset and Its Application for Satisfaction-Oriented Ranking (2025) Web-Scale Learning to Rank
42 RankExpert: A Mixture of Textual-and-Behavioral Experts for Multi-Objective Learning-to-Rank in Web Search (2025) Unbiased Learning to Rank
30 Sunhao Dai 37 3
42 Bias and Unfairness in Information Retrieval Systems: New Challenges in the LLM Era (2024) Bias Mitigation Methods
42 Unifying Bias and Unfairness in Information Retrieval: New Challenges in the LLM Era (2025) Bias Mitigation Methods
31 Sara Allawati 37 3
42 VulGen: Workshop on Vulnerabilities in Generative Systems for Information Retrieval (2026) Bias Mitigation Methods
36 A Comparative Analysis of Linguistic and Retrieval Diversity in LLM-Generated Search Queries (2025) User Behavior and Search Interaction